The author claims that the citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyle. While supporting the claim, the author gives various interesting reasoning, but he fails to make cogent case. The argument contains many loopholes which needs to address before making such claim.
Firstly, the author provides data from the survey to support his claim. But, he did not mention about the main objective of that survey. If the objective of the survey is different from studying the lifestyle of the people then it will not provide accurate results. The question not structured properly to get exact information about the lifestyle. Also, the author does not mention about the sample size, the area, and the time at which the survey took place. The given factors also affect the outcome of the survey. More information is needed about the survey to make logical for the reasoning.
Furthermore, the author mentions about the consumption of Kiran which is touted as healthy substance by the author. But supporting his this claim, the author does not provide any additional information about Kiran. There is also possibility that
it can be allergic to some people. The author does not mention about its chemical composition and also its medical properties. Kiran may also have unstated side effects also. Before claiming that Kiran is a healthy food, more information about Kiran is required.
In conclusion, after evaluating the argument from all angles and factors, more information is required to justify the authors claim. Otherwise, it is just a possibliity.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ???? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 252 350
No. of Characters: 1276 1500
No. of Different Words: 130 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.984 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.063 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.521 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 94 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.15 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.35 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.54 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bout the main objective of that survey. If the objective of the survey is differen...
^^
Line 6, column 170, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ran may also have unstated side effects also. Before claiming that Kiran is a heal...
^^^^
Line 6, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y also have unstated side effects also. Before claiming that Kiran is a healthy ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 2260.96107784 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 252.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61120458655 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 204.123752495 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543650793651 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 705.55239521 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9850384303 57.8364921388 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5 119.503703932 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 23.324526521 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 5.70786347227 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089674141241 0.218282227539 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370871660258 0.0743258471296 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581031418476 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536608393437 0.128457276422 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299460763994 0.0628817314937 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.3550499002 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.197005988 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 98.500998004 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.