This argument is flawed for numerous reason, Mason City residents have ranked water sports among their favorite activities and Mason river which flow through this city is used rarely for these pursuits, but water sport is comprised of swimming, boating, and fishing, so if the residents rarely using this river then from where the residents are using water for this activity.
First of all, the budget required in maintaining the riverside would be approved by another department rather than the city park department. It may be possible that the appropriate department has been passing enough budget to maintain riverside area but residents of that city are making it polluted and lying that they do not use the water of that river. If the author would have mentioned that residents are using the water, required in this activity, from somewhere else might be storing the water through rain, then it would have been more believable that residents are not using river water for this sport.
Secondly, it has been stated that after hearing people complaints, the state government has announced more plans to clean up the river so that people can make use of it for their sport activity. I would suggest, rather than investing more money in the project of cleaning up the river, the government should warn the people living in that area not to spoil the water and maintain the riverside area by making it clean. If people do not obey the instructions then the government should impose fine for miscreants.
Conclusively, it can be said, the above-stated argument has been open with so many unanswered questions and thus denounce because of lack of evidence.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 15
No. of Words: 277 350
No. of Characters: 1352 1500
No. of Different Words: 133 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.08 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.881 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.422 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 85 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 34.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.527 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.439 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.727 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.1 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
...ely for these pursuits, but water sport is comprised of swimming, boating, and fishing, so if t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... river then from where the residents are using water for this activity. First ...
^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had mentioned'?
Suggestion: had mentioned
... the water of that river. If the author would have mentioned that residents are using the water, req...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 55.5748502994 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 2260.96107784 61% => OK
No of words: 277.0 441.139720559 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00722021661 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50892917251 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 204.123752495 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490974729242 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 705.55239521 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 19.7664670659 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.8473053892 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.6674306954 57.8364921388 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.375 119.503703932 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.625 23.324526521 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.70786347227 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3465314427 0.218282227539 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132704595 0.0743258471296 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14666356432 0.0701772020484 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195276697842 0.128457276422 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18843366842 0.0628817314937 300% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 14.3799401198 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.3550499002 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 12.3882235529 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.1389221557 140% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.9071856287 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.