While the author makes a point here that old research done on children in Tertia is invalid.
but because of the lack of proper supporting statements author leaves us with some questions.
In argument, the Author is not stating how old research made by Dr. Field is it might be possible
that research done by doctor field is century old and the generation which author is observing
is different. Since thinking and views are different from generation by generation answers
to some questions might different.
The author is assuming that the research is done on kids of the same age group. Opinions vary
on the age of the child. We will need more information about the age group for making any conclusion regarding
the same. Furthermore, the author doesn't give us adequate information about the research of Dr. Field's
we don't have any information about the approach of Dr. Fields research without that stating that
Dr. Fields' research invalid will not be legal.
The author says in the argument that children talked about their parent's this doesn't mean
that they are reared by their parents. We need proper evidence about children of Tertia.
Moreover, the Author states that he used interview centered method for graduate students. But it
might possible that Dr. Phil used different methods that lead him to another conclusion. We will
need more clarification about Dr. Phil's research before any conclusions.
Thus because of flaws in argument, we will need more information and evidence before making
any conclusion about Dr. Phil's research.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 258 350
No. of Characters: 1268 1500
No. of Different Words: 122 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.008 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.915 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.515 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 92 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 66 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.03 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.462 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.401 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.635 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.272 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
While the author makes a point here that old ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...done on children in Tertia is invalid. but because of the lack of proper supportin...
^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ade by Dr. Field is it might be possible that research done by doctor field is ce...
^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the generation which author is observing is different. Since thinking and views a...
^^^
Line 6, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt from generation by generation answers to some questions might different. T...
^^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ids of the same age group. Opinions vary on the age of the child. We will need mo...
^^^
Line 11, column 35, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ding the same. Furthermore, the author doesnt give us adequate information about the ...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmation about the research of Dr. Fields we dont have any information about the a...
^^^
Line 12, column 4, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n about the research of Dr. Fields we dont have any information about the approach...
^^^^
Line 12, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ields research without that stating that Dr. Fields research invalid will not be ...
^^^
Line 15, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hildren talked about their parents this doesnt mean that they are reared by their pa...
^^^^^^
Line 15, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ked about their parents this doesnt mean that they are reared by their parents. W...
^^^
Line 17, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red method for graduate students. But it might possible that Dr. Phil used differ...
^^^
Line 18, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lead him to another conclusion. We will need more clarification about Dr. Phils ...
^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ls research before any conclusions. Thus because of flaws in argument, we will n...
^^^^
Line 21, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e information and evidence before making any conclusion about Dr. Phils research....
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 2260.96107784 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 255.0 441.139720559 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21568627451 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57347544294 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 204.123752495 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482352941176 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 705.55239521 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.230534432 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 23.324526521 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 5.15768463074 349% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 16.0 5.25449101796 305% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105083588723 0.218282227539 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398156258116 0.0743258471296 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373373539748 0.0701772020484 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.042487592022 0.128457276422 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359868613735 0.0628817314937 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 98.500998004 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.