The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend.Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom w

The letter sent to the friend states the main assumptions lying behind the judgment of Adams Realty- one of the two leading real estate firms, being superior. They refer to the number of agents, revenues, average price of home sales and the speed of selling. In the following passages every assumption will be considered separately to understand how they can be interpreted and make a contribution to the superiority of Adams Realty.
Firstly, number of workers is being seen a gradient of being successful. I will contradict with this idea by saying that two firms of the same size, having unequal number of workers, differ in effectiveness. The priority is given to the company having small number of employees, due to the fact that it does the same work with fewer workers. Nevertheless, this can’t be true about the companies that are not equal in size or having the same amount of work. However, it is mentioned that these two companies are leading real estate firms, which means somewhat equality in size. The judgment about these two firms having the same amount of work can be biased, because all other things equal the same amount of work can be done with a smaller number of workers. So we can’t judge about the market shares of these companies.
The second point concerns the revenues. This can depend on the amount of houses sold and their prices. The fact that average prices of houses are smaller at Fitch Realty, and recalling the statement about the market share from the preceding paragraph, it can be implied that the statement of revenues giving superiority to the first company is an equivocal one. The ambiguity arises from the unknown fact about market shares.
Next point concerns the speed of selling. This is a positive factor contributing the superiority of any of firms. Even though the statement is made stronger by personal experience, it is not a reliable one due a great time lag between the similar experiences. Therefore this statement should be analyzed thoroughly before making any decision.
To summarize, I would like to say that some facts are missing to form a complete picture, therefore it will be good to analyze the number of sales of the companies and the speed of selling more scrutinously to give a proper advice on the choice between them.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...ive factor contributing the superiority of any of firms. Even though the statement is mad...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...me lag between the similar experiences. Therefore this statement should be analyzed thoro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'proper advice'.
Suggestion: proper advice
...ed of selling more scrutinously to give a proper advice on the choice between them.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 55.5748502994 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 391.0 441.139720559 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89002557545 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61698947357 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501278772379 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2788753573 57.8364921388 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.631578947 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 5.70786347227 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127376004174 0.218282227539 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393472130877 0.0743258471296 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078192935811 0.0701772020484 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710311890713 0.128457276422 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905072655777 0.0628817314937 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.