The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls around the country."The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked

Here the author is stating that if the shopping mall access roads get done by Appian Roadways then they will not have to be repaired for at least four long years. This prediction by the author is based on reasons not strong enough to be cogent for a number of reasons.

First of all, perhaps the particular section of Route 40 which was paved by Appian Roadways has not been used much and thus has not required any repair in more than four years. Whereas, the access roads of new shopping malls will be busy on a regular basis as shopping malls are center of attraction to the public. Thus it cannot be assumed that shopping mall roads will not be needing any retouch in a long period of time.

Moreover, buying a state-of-the-art paving machinery by a Roadway company does not necessarily mean that the company is going to provide quality work. It can be a case that the company has actually purchased a second-hand or a faulty machinery just as a show-off to attract customers. Or even if the machinery is of best quality, then even the quality of work by the association is not guaranteed, because in order to use a machine properly, experienced employees are needed who knows how to operate the machine properly to provide work of high standard.

All in all, hiring a new quality-control manager does not also assure great work by the association. The new manager can be a fresher with very little or no experience. In fact, the Appian Roadways may actually have only one quality-control manager, which is this new manager, and perhaps a greater number of quality-control manager is needed to monitor a laborious work of making the access roads of shopping malls.

Finally, it can be concluded that people might choose Appian Roadways on Good Intentions Roadways based on the already existing work examples of both the Roadways. However, the author’s argument of getting quality work from Appian Roadways which will not be needing any retouch for four years at minimum is not convincing with the reasons he argued on.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...are center of attraction to the public. Thus it cannot be assumed that shopping mall...
^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...sumed that shopping mall roads will not be needing any retouch in a long period of time. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ll not be needing any retouch in a long period of time. Moreover, buying a state-of-the-art...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
... customers. Or even if the machinery is of best quality, then even the quality of work ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 261, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ork from Appian Roadways which will not be needing any retouch for four years at minimum i...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, thus, whereas, at least, in fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 352.0 441.139720559 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79829545455 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7295193753 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497159090909 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3082807287 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.923076923 119.503703932 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 23.324526521 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 5.70786347227 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09809780241 0.218282227539 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391662280654 0.0743258471296 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313376984076 0.0701772020484 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562033893402 0.128457276422 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341485351779 0.0628817314937 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.3550499002 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.197005988 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.5979740519 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 353 350
No. of Characters: 1640 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.335 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.646 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.596 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.154 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.986 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.846 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.357 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.659 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.103 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5