The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast food w

The Vice President of the company claims that their best means of saving money is to return to Buzzoff for all their pest control services. To bolster his claims he had put forward some of the evidences. One of them is when they used services from Fly away pest control company they discovered that 20,000 dollars of food got wasted. Furthermore, he added even though the price charged by Fly away is a lit bit lower the best way to mitigate the losses is by utilizing Buzzoff services. To consider his claims as viable there are few questions he need to answer to provide more scrupulous information.
Firstly, the amount of food production at different places is never mentioned. There might be a chance that food production at Winterville might be shorter than that of other location. It could be a chance that lower production lead to slight pest damage while in the other location the demand might be higher which lead to a enormous pest damage. This in turn on choosing either of the services would not help to control whether the prices are higher or lower. If this is considered an important issue then the argument would be undermined.
Secondly, what if the demand in Winterville location is higher ? For instance, if the customers are readily waiting for food to take away or dine because of immense popularity there would never have been a possibility of food getting wasted or left where as in Palm city there might be few people who like this restaurant food. If they don't show interest in purchasing these food items which are already prepared and left in refrigerators or cold storages for several days the pest damage would happen irrespective of the quality of pest control services used devolving the argument even more.
Lastly, the environmental conditions are not discussed in the given argument. What if Winterville is a cold location and always covered with snow ? This would naturally help to attenuate the pest damage acting as a cold storage. But it would not be the case when there are higher temperatures. Having exorbitant degree's in Palm city which would in turn require more human effort to thwart the negative effects caused by the pest larvae. There might have been a shortage of pesticides in this particular area because of intricate transportation system. Even though there is a shortage, Winterville could hold because of temperature benefits and palm city got affected due to dearth of supplies.
To conclude, to consider the argument tenable there are several unwarranted assumptions which the vice president need to answer to provide more evidence and to bolster his claims. At this point the argument is considered dubious and almost falls flat with these misleading questions.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...o bolster his claims he had put forward some of the evidences. One of them is when they use...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he demand might be higher which lead to a enormous pest damage. This in turn on c...
^
Line 2, column 462, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...whether the prices are higher or lower. If this is considered an important issue t...
^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...sibility of food getting wasted or left where as in Palm city there might be few people ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... who like this restaurant food. If they dont show interest in purchasing these food ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2264.0 2260.96107784 100% => OK
No of words: 458.0 441.139720559 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94323144105 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65959759311 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484716157205 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 705.55239521 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7361701336 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.909090909 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.70786347227 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26729664638 0.218282227539 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654169131602 0.0743258471296 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677479004297 0.0701772020484 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140477170009 0.128457276422 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609431776532 0.0628817314937 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 98.500998004 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 459 350
No. of Characters: 2228 1500
No. of Different Words: 224 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.629 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.854 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.587 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 159 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.864 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.836 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.282 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.282 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.106 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5