The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis."Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard ho

According to the author, he summarizes the success of transfering old and poor residential area into industrial factories, the he recommends this method to implement in the opposite side of the city. This suggestion is problematic in some parts ,let's evaluate this argument carefully.

To begin with, I doubt the time is too long for a new city planning in that the sucessful case the author tells us was happened ten years ago. Given so successul this area made, as an industrial region, the necessity of another new industrial area plan seems questionable. The author does not provide us the reason for create a new indutrial area. Because whether those new factories will thrive like the previous place's ones is in question. Maybe the established area was benifited from the freeway nearby which provide convinient transportation for products while the opposite place was in the moutain region where the transportation is not convinient as the previous one.

In addition, there is no sufficient statistics about the crime rates and property tax revenue. The author merely tells us the crime rates is declining and tax revenue is increasing. While without specific data we can not conclude this action of shifting residential area into industiral use works. Maybe the crime rate is decreasing a little bit and there are still lots of crimes in that place. Tax revenue, likewise.So the author should make a wide survey for this action to prove its success.

On the other hand, let discuss with the opposite side of the city. To be honest, I got few effective information of this area given by the author's statement. It would be arbitrary to copy the action implemented ten years ago in the othe side of the city.What's more, the author indicates that some houses and apartments are unoccupied so it would be easy to alternate housing for residents. First of all, we do not know how many buidings in total at this place,with out the number of these transigent residents, we can not make the conclusion that it would be an easy case of alternating new houses. Secondly, we do not know the most of the residents' opinions about this alternation. I believe some of them would be happy to live in a new house, while there is a high possibility that most of them wouldn't like to leave their homes.

In conclusion, I fully comprehend the author's mind which want to revitalize the city. While the evidences are not convincing by the aged time and lacking informations in both of the two places. He should make a wide survey and then to make a choice.

Votes
Average: 4.6 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'he'?
Suggestion: the; he
...dential area into industrial factories, the he recommends this method to implement in ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... suggestion is problematic in some parts ,lets evaluate this argument carefully. ...
^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...reason for create a new indutrial area. Because whether those new factories will thrive...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eclining and tax revenue is increasing. While without specific data we can not conclu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...s. Maybe the crime rate is decreasing a little bit and there are still lots of crimes in t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...es in that place. Tax revenue, likewise.So the author should make a wide survey fo...
^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e information of this area given by the authors statement. It would be arbitrary to cop...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whats
... years ago in the othe side of the city.Whats more, the author indicates that some ho...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... years ago in the othe side of the city.Whats more, the author indicates that some ho...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
...how many buidings in total at this place,with out the number of these transigent resi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 461, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...ow many buidings in total at this place,with out the number of these transigent resident...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 798, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...is a high possibility that most of them wouldnt like to leave their homes. In conclu...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 2260.96107784 94% => OK
No of words: 438.0 441.139720559 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83561643836 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74215645622 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 204.123752495 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522831050228 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5404929684 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.857142857 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7619047619 5.70786347227 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11434244229 0.218282227539 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313993375759 0.0743258471296 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443087001356 0.0701772020484 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574004628809 0.128457276422 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541315198476 0.0628817314937 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.3799401198 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.5979740519 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 98.500998004 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 442 350
No. of Characters: 2065 1500
No. of Different Words: 224 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.585 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.672 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.644 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.048 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.194 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.291 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.519 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.137 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5