The parent argues that students will bring their own food due to lack of food options, but the parent forgets to ask if the school has chosen this limited option routine due to concerns pertaining to the cost or any recommendations from medical study done on these students. Without considering such details it would improper to blame Swift for not providing more number of options to the students. To decide better on changing the vendor the parent can bring a forum to discuss the viability of adding more food options and can take the opinion of their children for the same.
Given that the reasons are noble while considering Swift, the parent
can compare the quality of food that was served by the previous vendor and competing vendors because, if the competing vendor does not provide food of desired quality or nutrition content the recommendation made by the parent to replace the vendor may not serve the purpose. Another question that arises is what was the type of food that was brought by students before Swift was introduced? Did the children who brought their own food suffer from serious health consequences or was their food unhealthy? Without answering such questions the parent seems to have hurried with his recommendation.
Parents who are the cares takers of their children are the one who ensure discipline and if the school finds that the food brought by students previously was detrimental to their growth, it is essential to follow the diet provided by Swift. In order to provide proper incentives for children to take up the lunch in school, the parent can look for ways in which the students can juggle some portion of home cooked meal or additional meal which is tastier with the meal provided by Swift.
The claim made by the parent cannot be supported from the points mentioned and any alternative vendor could have effect worse effects than Swift
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 320 350
No. of Characters: 1541 1500
No. of Different Words: 161 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.229 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.816 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.438 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 76 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.353 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.414 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.646 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oble while considering Swift, the parent can compare the quality of food that was...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 320.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.903125 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48914636158 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5125 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.6635605463 57.8364921388 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.9 119.503703932 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 23.324526521 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.70786347227 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164489986086 0.218282227539 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664357381996 0.0743258471296 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390898343193 0.0701772020484 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952342812472 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260072846281 0.0628817314937 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.3799401198 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.3550499002 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.