One increasingly popular policy for promoting renewable energy is a feed-in tariff. Under such a policy, investors on any scale, from large corporations to individual homeowners, produce their own energy from solar panels installed on their property. Electricity companies are then required to purchase the energy through a long-term contract at an increased rate that would allow the investors to more than offset the cost over time. There is no denying that the initial cost of solar installation would be a burden on the investor. In strenuous economic times, both businesses and homeowners might be reluctant to make the investment, with concern that the payout could be less than sufficient or the plan might prove unfeasible. However, research has shown that a feed-in tariff plan is not only stable but also exceptionally effective, and ought to be more actively pursued.
Although the argument sounds as the great solution to address the increasing demand of the energy. While analyzing the statement profoundly lack of evidence and the groundless assumption qualify the validation.
First of all, author assumes that there is no author means of promoting renewable energy program except the feed-in tarif policy. Perhaps there might be other policy, which is more sustainable and cost effective.
Similarly, he assumes, the feed in tariff policy is not yet implemented and would be successful in near future. It may be true that there have been already this kind of practice and large scale producer and individual homeowner might not be interested because of its limitations. Large number of storage batteries, huge cost and several other drawbacks might frustating and cannot run in long term and the business firm would not get enough profit from such policy. The assumption would be reliable if background information and other succes story is presented.
Furthermore, he assumes that to promote the renewable enrgy one should be concerns just in solar energy. In many case, solar energy required large number of space for storage battery –if is harmful too, and receiving panel. But there would be many alternatives other than solar energy, hydropower, for example, have less environmental impact andgreater efficiency in terms of both energy and cost other than the solar energy. There would be the no possibility of other renewable energy–wind, thermal, hydropower tidal—and the expected location might be the desert, but he have to clearly mentions the background information and supporting premise to strenthen his argument.
Finally he concede the research outcomes reluctantly, the research might be other place where the solar energy is most feasible or the researh might be carried out in special circumtance. Without mentioning the relible cost, effectiveness and suitable example the feed-in tariff policy is questionable.
So in conclusion , althouhg the author concern in promoting the rnewable enrgy is appreciable, one could not convinced just these superficial assumption, more detail evidence shoud be submit for the reliability of ate proposal.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: First of all, author assumes that there is no author means of promoting renewable energy program except the feed-in tarif policy.
Error: feed-in Suggestion: feeding
Error: tarif Suggestion: tariff
Sentence: Large number of storage batteries, huge cost and several other drawbacks might frustating and cannot run in long term and the business firm would not get enough profit from such policy.
Error: frustating Suggestion: frustrating
Sentence: The assumption would be reliable if background information and other succes story is presented.
Error: succes Suggestion: success
Sentence: Furthermore, he assumes that to promote the renewable enrgy one should be concerns just in solar energy.
Error: enrgy Suggestion: energy
Sentence: But there would be many alternatives other than solar energy, hydropower, for example, have less environmental impact andgreater efficiency in terms of both energy and cost other than the solar energy.
Error: hydropower Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: andgreater Suggestion: an greater
Sentence: There would be the no possibility of other renewable energy?wind, thermal, hydropower tidal?and the expected location might be the desert, but he have to clearly mentions the background information and supporting premise to strenthen his argument.
Error: hydropower Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: strenthen Suggestion: strengthen
Sentence: Finally he concede the research outcomes reluctantly, the research might be other place where the solar energy is most feasible or the researh might be carried out in special circumtance.
Error: researh Suggestion: research
Error: circumtance Suggestion: circumstance
Sentence: Without mentioning the relible cost, effectiveness and suitable example the feed-in tariff policy is questionable.
Error: relible Suggestion: reliable
Error: feed-in Suggestion: feeding
Sentence: So in conclusion , althouhg the author concern in promoting the rnewable enrgy is appreciable, one could not convinced just these superficial assumption, more detail evidence shoud be submit for the reliability of ate proposal.
Error: enrgy Suggestion: energy
Error: rnewable Suggestion: renewable
Error: althouhg Suggestion: although
Error: shoud Suggestion: should
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 17 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 342 350
No. of Characters: 1813 1500
No. of Different Words: 189 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.3 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.301 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.719 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 139 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.043 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.337 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.117 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sful in near future. It may be true that there have been already this kind of pra...
^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause of its limitations. Large number of storage batteries, huge cost and several...
^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun case seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cases'.
Suggestion: many cases
...ld be concerns just in solar energy. In many case, solar energy required large number of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 572, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ed location might be the desert, but he have to clearly mentions the background info...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ing premise to strenthen his argument. Finally he concede the research outcomes reluct...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'concedes'.
Suggestion: concedes
... to strenthen his argument. Finally he concede the research outcomes reluctantly, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... special circumtance. Without mentioning the relible cost, effectiveness and suit...
^^
Line 6, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...olicy is questionable. So in conclusion , althouhg the author concern in promotin...
^^
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'convince'
Suggestion: convince
...ble enrgy is appreciable, one could not convinced just these superficial assumption, more...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 2260.96107784 83% => OK
No of words: 340.0 441.139720559 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49411764706 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86966891801 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3259734984 57.8364921388 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.533333333 119.503703932 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.70786347227 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192824232661 0.218282227539 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658724671026 0.0743258471296 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420721041068 0.0701772020484 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901626811526 0.128457276422 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439385215324 0.0628817314937 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.3799401198 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.5979740519 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.32208582834 118% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 98.500998004 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.