Tusk University should build a new recreational facility both to attract new students and to better serve the needs of our current student body Tusk projects that enrollment will double over the next 10 years based on current trends The new student body i

Essay topics:

Tusk University should build a new recreational facility, both to attract new students and to better
serve the needs of our current student body. Tusk projects that enrollment will double over the
next 10 years, based on current trends. The new student body is expected to reflect a much higher
percentage of commuter students than we currently enroll. This will make the existing facilities
inadequate. Moreover, the cost of health and recreation club membership in our community has
increased rapidly in recent years. Thus, students will find it much more advantageous to make use
of the facilities on campus. Finally, an attractive new recreation center would make prospective
students, especially athletically gifted ones, more likely to enroll at Tusk.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument.
Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are
for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

Tusk university is envisioning a future increase in its students body to approximately twice its
current number in a decade, and deems it fit to build new recreational facilities to better serve its current and future students. Their basis provided for this conclusion is the likelihood of increased pressure on existing facilities by an increased students' body and believe with the rising costs of health and recreational club enrollments in the community, students' preferences for usage of the school's facilities would certainly increase. This argument begs a lot of questions as it is founded on several assumptions.
While recreational facilities are certainly beneficial to any school, there is no evidence provided by the author stating the current usage capacity. Perhaps the students' recreational needs are not in line with the services offered by the school's facilities. Who knows if the new ones the school plans to build would even suit current and prospective students. It wouldn't be out of place to realize staff are the major beneficiaries of recreational services in the school, and hence the school might be erroneously assuming the current capacities of its facilities would be insufficient for the expected growth in its student body. If students' interest in these facilities is low due to a general
disinterest in recreation or distinct recreational preferences from the ones offered by the school,
there is no proof the situation would be any different by building more.
Of course, the saying "when the desirable is not available, the available becomes desirable", has
some elements of truth in it. However, this does not necessarily apply to every sphere of life. If
the available recreational facilities in the school is incompatible with their wants and needs, and
the costs of recreational clubs has risen rapidly in the community, it does not necessarily imply a
sudden inclination to use the schools own. Such a scenario may lead to reduced expenses for other activities to continue their recreational pursuit, or disinterest in participating in any recreational activity. Moreover, there is no proof of stagnancy or a slower rise in the costs of accessing the school's facilities. It is possible, community recreational facilities have been made more attractive, exciting with newer activities, hence the risen costs, which can even attract more students to it.
Additionally, a new recreational activity would not necessarily attract top athletic talents, unless the author can provide evidence showing otherwise. We cannot certainly decipher intentions of prospective athletic prodigies by guesswork. They might be attracted to the supportive culture of the community the school is situated in, and decided to pursue studies in a school closeby. It can also be the school's top network for nurturing exciting young talents into future stars that attracts them and not necessarily the presence of more recreational activities. Hence, if general and specific
reasons for athletes choosing Tusk university has not been established, we can remain skeptical about the author's claims about attraction of more talents by building more facilities.
Conclusively, the numerous assumptions in the author's claims makes this arguments less credible and hence, the school should reflect upon its decision to construct new recreational facilities, as this might not necessarily attract more athletic talents unless their intent for prioritising schools is established. Furthermore, current recreational usage and interest by students isn't established and unless such information is available, we cannot conclude a growing students body would necessitate construction of new facilities.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students body to approximately twice its current number in a decade, and deems it...
^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...it current and prospective students. It wouldnt be out of place to realize staff are th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these facilities is low due to a general disinterest in recreation or distinct re...
^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces from the ones offered by the school, there is no proof the situation would be...
^^^
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e available becomes desirable', has some elements of truth in it. However, t...
^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sarily apply to every sphere of life. If the available recreational facilities in...
^^^
Line 8, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpatible with their wants and needs, and the costs of recreational clubs has rise...
^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mmunity, it does not necessarily imply a sudden inclination to use the schools ow...
^^^
Line 11, column 594, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tivities. Hence, if general and specific reasons for athletes choosing Tusk unive...
^^^
Line 12, column 31, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to tusk'
Suggestion: To tusk
...pecific reasons for athletes choosing Tusk university has not been established, we...
^^^^
Line 13, column 68, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...assumptions in the authors claims makes this arguments less credible and hence, the ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 379, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...eational usage and interest by students isnt established and unless such information...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 55.5748502994 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3162.0 2260.96107784 140% => OK
No of words: 568.0 441.139720559 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56690140845 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.56307096286 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16663251669 2.78398813304 114% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 204.123752495 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457746478873 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 992.7 705.55239521 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5664915206 57.8364921388 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.571428571 119.503703932 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0476190476 23.324526521 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52380952381 5.70786347227 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 5.15768463074 252% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265328974815 0.218282227539 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824750100552 0.0743258471296 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827653505963 0.0701772020484 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094142016828 0.128457276422 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851224275535 0.0628817314937 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.3799401198 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.3550499002 74% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.5979740519 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 98.500998004 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 12.3882235529 129% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 570 350
No. of Characters: 3084 1500
No. of Different Words: 248 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.886 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.411 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.077 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 239 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 202 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 161 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 102 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.846 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.341 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.341 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.127 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5