Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
In the reading, it could be understood that the proponent of the woven basket states that the basket are endemic to Palea. While the opponent argue that the woven-basket is not pertinent just to Palea and is quite common to other cities. However, before this statements can be set into stones there are three questions must be answered.
Firstly, how similar were these basket in Lithos compared to the basket in Palea? In other words, can we say that these basket were similar to one another in all ways? It is completely possible that the basket were the only means of carrying things around during that period and people in all cities made medley of basket.
Secondly, was boat the only means of transportation from Palea to Lithos? In other words, where this two villages only connected via a river? It is completely possible that the people from Palea must have traveled by foot to other villages and would have carried these basket for their belongings and must have exchanged the basket for some other item or it could be other way around that people From Lithos came to Palea and they found the basket intriguing and took them back with them. If either of the scenario has a merit the conclusion drawn by opponents could be called into question.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... woven basket states that the basket are endemic to Palea. While the opponent arg...
^^
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...common to other cities. However, before this statements can be set into stones ther...
^^^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... However, before this statements can be set into stones there are three question...
^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this basket' or 'these baskets'?
Suggestion: this basket; these baskets
...nswered. Firstly, how similar were these basket in Lithos compared to the basket in Pal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this basket' or 'these baskets'?
Suggestion: this basket; these baskets
... Palea? In other words, can we say that these basket were similar to one another in all ways...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and people in all cities made medley of basket. Secondly, was boat the o...
^^
Line 11, column 264, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this basket' or 'these baskets'?
Suggestion: this basket; these baskets
...o other villages and would have carried these basket for their belongings and must have exch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 490, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ntriguing and took them back with them. If either of the scenario has a merit the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 2260.96107784 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 220.0 441.139720559 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77272727273 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.56307096286 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30511468674 2.78398813304 83% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 204.123752495 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540909090909 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 705.55239521 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.8925542013 57.8364921388 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.324526521 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.70786347227 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210606672932 0.218282227539 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860313723608 0.0743258471296 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463364349448 0.0701772020484 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143432118213 0.128457276422 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026540180963 0.0628817314937 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 98.500998004 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.