1. No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of prompt has adduced that the fundament of enhancement in any field requires the incorporation with knowledge and practice from other fields. This is a claim with which I generally do concur. Among the countless reasons and facts which give adherence to my standpoint, I would list the most conspicuous ones in what follows.
The first striking fact which should be highlighted is the current trend of knowledge is the interdisciplinary one, which is based on the interconnection between the various fields of science. in this case, possessing a comprehensive cognition over the different topics could be an effective way of getting information. This fact is also verified by a noteworthy intelligence study conducted in my place. According to this reliable study, during the last decade, the knowledge has converted from a sole-focused science to multi-branched one. For instance, while in the past the civil, mechanical, electrical engineering and architecture were separated and were considered irrelevant and unique courses, during the last five years, a field of building science which covers entire four fields has appeared. In this scenario, focusing merely to one field such as civil engineering will be backward; since this understanding is lacking from the required rearing from the other three fields. Therefore, nowadays' requirement obliges the person to have complete knowledge over the various fields.
Another equally crucial reason which should be considered is the importance of practice; indeed, the practice makes perfection. Thus, while a person had the chance of implementing his data in the realistic and practical world, he would get cogent comprehension from that field. An example which can shed a spotlight on the issue is my experience. I have a master degree in the field of civil engineering and I spent six years for this qualification. During these six years, whole contents discussed in the classes were the theoretical base, and my knowledge was publication I had read. However, while I enter the professional environment, I felt the exact difference between the two environments of university and execution. My knowledge was useless since there were lots of factors which worked against what was mentioned in the textbooks. I would not get those data until I have got the working experience. Consequently, a combination of knowledge and experiences is the base of advance in learning and perfection.
However, some people may believe that spending time for learning an unrelated task is a waste of time and energy. Although this belief seems logic in the first glance, it lacks a subtle point and overlooks the fact mentioned in the first paragraphs. The modern knowledge is forwarding to the amalgamation and combination of different fields. As a result, any irrelevant issue can be evaluated as a novel perspective to the current data, which proliferates and flourishes it to the further unknown areas and causes the advancement of science.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons and fact explicitly depict that the combination of theoretical knowledge with practice and understanding from other fields is helpful. Since the current science is multi-branches, the practice boosts understanding.
- tpo44-integ 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use there are today 70
- tpo11.1 86
- 31.As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 83
- tpo30 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
... between the various fields of science. in this case, possessing a comprehensive c...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2747.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.365234375 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1737403834 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5078125 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 847.8 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0704323328 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.88 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.48 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22833917384 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619260538904 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465346253941 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13334810914 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407997676326 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.