1.The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for

Essay topics:

1. The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The author of prompt has proposed that the lucid benchmark of a leader’s effectiveness is welfare stand of denizens. This is the claim with which I strongly do concur. Among the countless reasons and facts which give adherence to my viewpoint, I would list the most conspicuous ones in what follows.

The first striking fact which should be highlighted here is that providing the salient of people is the main responsibility of a leader. In the modern era, a governor is of the people, by the people, and for the people; in other words, nowadays a leader regardless of his religious, nationality, and sex is selected from a people and give a service to the same people. In a case that the majority get satisfied with these services, the leader has done his occupation correctly. For instance, considered one of the categories of welfare such as the high-level of health stands of society as the evaluation factor. In a case that a governor has provided the free public services which informs people about the contiguous illness and methods of prevention, or free treatment center for curing the severe illness, people will stand in better health status and they will not have to care about their basic needs of physical health. Therefore, people's satisfaction with the service shows who well the governor has done his fundament duty.

Another equally noteworthy reason which should be considered is that the leader is obliged to provide this welfare to warrants his political group popularity. Indeed, any leader is elected from a specific political group, and he is the representor of that group. Thus, his function is measured as the entire group's function. If that political group is willing to possess its popularities and get higher votes in the other election, the candid leader has to provide the well-being of the denizens. An obvious example of this reason is my country instance, since the current government of my country does not work efficiently, and people cannot fulfill their basic requirement, at the election of the mayor, the candidate of his group has not been elected. Since people have assumed that the same malfunction will be presented by this candidate too.

However, some people may hold the view that there some long-termed programs which requires extra energy and efforts and if a governor has focused on this aim and sacrifices the people welfare, it will not be titled as the ineffectiveness of the people. Although this view is logic is some bases, it overlooks a subtle point. A leader should have this capacity to handle both sides simultaneously and fairly. In fact, while the long-term project is processing properly, people are also should get satisfied with their initial needs.

To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons and facts explicitly depict that the sound evaluation factor of a leader's effectiveness is the well-being of the people. Since the initial duty of the leader is providing the welfare, and this satisfaction should be provided until the political group backing the president continues its reputation. Besides no crucial and long-term plan does not halt the governors from fulfilling this notable responsibility.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 756, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...date of his group has not been elected. Since people have assumed that the same malfu...
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...t that the sound evaluation factor of a leaders effectiveness is the well-being of the ...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in fact, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2663.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09177820268 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84108144268 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48948374761 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6088868069 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.045454545 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7727272727 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157111330713 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508612624747 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354674420706 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936711648803 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270240570746 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.