Students have always looked up to their teachers and mentors as role models when they are under their instruction. Children are often found copying their teacher's and mentor's mannerisms and way of conduct as they see them as better versions of themselves which they aspire to become. Generally, as any two people with similar mindsets get along well, students learn much more from teachers or mentors with whom they share similar ideas. However, the case is different when teachers are fundamentally different from students, student usually feels a level of hostility from such teachers or mentors and cannot learn anything from such educators. The prompt here recommends confirms the same by stating that people are much more likely to learn from people with whom they share their views rather than with people with whom they face a disagreement, the reason being disagreement stresses students and limits learning. Undoubtedly, such a view is justified for the reasons that are detailed below.
To begin with, since finding common ground between people who have radical ideologies is very difficult, no fruitful learning cannot place and as disagreement is only natural to come up during the learning process, a heated argument follows. It is very hard to reconcile with people who we do not share views with because even their general way of conveying ideas and details to us would be almost alien to us. This alien method of things would create confusion and ultimately cause a disagreement between the two. This disagreement would eventually heat up as the two are fundamentally different and would be forced to take sides and ultimately no consensus would be reached in the stressful environment. For instance, we should look no further than TV debates where contestants are not ready to cede even an inch of ground to the other side. Do we see new philosophies or ideologies spring up from such debates? Definitely, No. All that ensues from such a debate is chaos, the chaos that forces you to change the channel or switch off the TV.
Secondly, people usually take a small disagreement on their ego just for the sake of winning the argument and start furnishing lies, and the other side concedes to these lies because they become too stressed from the debate and their thinking faculty diminishes as the argument ensues. If an educator and a student were to be caught up in such a situation where they disagree on a point and the teacher just because of his ego makes use of lies to win the argument. Even though he might win the argument only to be caught later, he would have advertently taught his student wrong facts and concepts which is very detrimental to any learning process. For instance, we have the case of Socrates who later started lying to Niro, one of Socrates' students, when they got into a disagreement. Even though Socrates won the argument and was later caught by Niro. Niro had to suffer because he had accepted the fabrication Socrates had made. He accepted them also because he had become too stressed from the long argument he was having with Socrates.
In conclusion, we can say that learning is a very delicate process, and to foster the best learning environment it is quite important the student and teacher must have a shared ideology so that no argument ensues that could hamper learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1046, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hange the channel or switch off the TV. Secondly, people usually take a small di...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2774.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 564.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91843971631 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59282186334 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478723404255 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 851.4 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8302382866 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.095238095 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217533796753 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642139514609 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484442239629 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134134617413 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431824331616 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.