Neither do I agree with the claim that the author claims nor the reason he mentions. While overly discord would possibly be frustrating to some extent, people with different opinions would usually bring positive effect for one to improve. Therefore, I believe one would learn more from those who don’t share the same views with us than from those who do.
Admittedly, in some extreme scenario, blind disagreement from other people may impede one from achieving his goal. Examples are everywhere on the Internet nowadays. If one look at the comment section of a news, he may find that people debate with each other without logic. In the era when all can express their opinion with freedom, many people fail to address their view with the correct manner. Rather than discussing the pros and cons to some specific problem, they just accentuate their own points without listening to others. Such disagreement and debate between people is undeniably useless and pointless, and no one learns anything from the debate.
However, we should aware that the situation mentioned above is not what rational and reasonable people would do. By offering other different opinion, they would exchange their ideas, considering why they fail to reach a consensus, and by finding such reason, they may realize what the problem is, which in return would bring valuable outcomes not only for themselves, but also for the human race. It is commonly seen that two school children have different answer to the same given problem by their teacher. Not offering them the sample solution directly, the teacher may ask them to show their own approach separately and discuss the difference. One child may find himself a dummy error during calculation, while the other may realize that he fails to understand the question correctly. Such process of learning, by discussing one’s own perspective from distinct aspects, and arguing with rationality, would definitely help student to improve their studies.
For the human being as a whole, peer evaluation is one of the most indispensable tool that helps to improve the academe. For a specific essay, not knowing the author, a scholar comment on what he not agrees with. While receiving enough critics, the author should consider whether opinions from other scholars would contribute to his essay, which may lead to surprising breakthrough in his field of study. As we can see, disagreement not only doesn’t become the drawback of academic improvement, but also drives the improvement of the whole human race.
In sum, I would still suggest that people can learn more from those who can provide contradict opinions with us. Arguing and discussing with them with rationality and critical thinking, rather than blindly expressing one’w own views while ignoring others, we would learn more than by just listening to those who agree with us.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.191011235955 0.240241500013 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.151685393258 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0842696629213 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0543071161049 0.0497285424764 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.061797752809 0.0444667217837 139% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.123595505618 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0393258426966 0.0406280797675 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58863749281 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0262172284644 0.030933414821 85% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0805243445693 0.0997080785238 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0430711610487 0.0249443105267 173% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0224719101124 0.0148568991511 151% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2880.0 2732.02544248 105% => OK
No of words: 467.0 452.878318584 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1670235546 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.368308351178 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289079229122 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197002141328 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115631691649 0.132149295362 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58863749281 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 219.290929204 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528907922912 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 62.3332920702 55.4138127331 112% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.2380952381 23.380412469 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6459279268 59.4972553346 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.142857143 141.124799967 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2380952381 23.380412469 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.47619047619 0.674092028746 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 51.1460181503 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.32167832168 1.64882698954 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259278994609 0.391690518653 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0912528921875 0.123202303941 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0527438031332 0.077325440228 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.50291616725 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122517915607 0.149214159877 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925915100494 0.161403998019 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519025241654 0.0892212321368 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.291400177211 0.385218514788 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.12799549602 0.0692045440612 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175284791891 0.275328986314 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419897289275 0.0653680567796 64% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.