In our day to day interactions, we come across several people who we both agree and disagree with. Some have their views perfectly in line with our own. Some think differently. While meeting people with the same set of beliefs as ours reinforces our sense of affirmation, people who possess views different from our own come with their own merit. I believe that people with contradictory views are to be heard and their opinions to be considered in our to enhance our own learning.
Different people have different reasons backing their views and beliefs. If we restrict ourselves to views that comply with our own beliefs, we are losing out on what is shaping the thought process of people who believe otherwise. Looking at an issue from different angles not only enables us to apply reasoning, it also helps us develop our critical thinking skills. Inculcation of good reasoning and critical thinking abilities would shape individuals into well rounded personalities, who would be able to put these tools into their everyday use.
Along with the critical skills discussed above, the opportunity of garnering new knowledge is equally lucrative. Individuals believing otherwise may have their beliefs entrenched in facts, figures, narratives, or events that corroborates their views. Interacting with them would present us with an opportunity to access the knowledge and be more enlightened. The knowledge would can play a huge role in not just validating our own views, but amending it with what is more just or ethical.
In contradiction, people who possess the same belief as ours is not serving any intellectual purpose. They would give us a sense of affirmation on the beliefs we currently hold, and perhaps a discussion pointer to talk on. While the opportunity to discuss events, reasons and narratives exist, it can be greatly furthered if the people who belief are included.
To sum up, it can be said that disagreement is a great source of mustering intellectual prowess. It develops in us skills that adorns our personality as well as make us more knowledgeable. Taking counter-views in consideration along with doing course correction for us would also make us more open minded.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in fact', 'as well as', 'to sum up', 'what is more']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.203562340967 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.180661577608 0.157235817809 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.089058524173 0.0880659088768 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0559796437659 0.0497285424764 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0992366412214 0.0444667217837 223% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.124681933842 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0559796437659 0.0406280797675 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.92047167453 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027989821883 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.00508905852417 0.0016655270985 306% => OK
Determiners: 0.0534351145038 0.0997080785238 54% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0254452926209 0.0249443105267 102% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0229007633588 0.0148568991511 154% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2193.0 2732.02544248 80% => OK
No of words: 359.0 452.878318584 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.10863509749 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.359331476323 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.281337047354 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197771587744 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.150417827298 0.132149295362 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92047167453 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 219.290929204 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526462395543 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 56.8416900026 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8947368421 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3779824684 59.4972553346 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.421052632 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.674092028746 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 47.0284415775 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.14393939394 1.64882698954 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239516912341 0.391690518653 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0999271903838 0.123202303941 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0740476380679 0.077325440228 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.506597435545 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128946758101 0.149214159877 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877380054546 0.161403998019 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501410675616 0.0892212321368 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.249162301678 0.385218514788 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0828535148507 0.0692045440612 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148953384225 0.275328986314 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444446587656 0.0653680567796 68% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.