"Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are
entirely harmless, they in fact, prevent people from developing into truly strong and
independent individuals."
Today's world is full of conveniences and luxuries, and people tends to adapt those luxurious life because of the very nature of human-being to acclimatize with the surrounding environment. The prompt, however argues that this conveniences and luxuries are limiting the growth of an individuals. But I mostly disagree with the authors point of view for two main reasons, however I do concede that too much of sophisticated life would bring down the productivity of human-being.
To begin, talking about the conveniences, these are the one which are created by human beings only for the sake of comfort in the day to day life to make life easier. For example, there are many advanced technologies that are replacing the outdated ones for the betterment of the task to be done in convenient way. New technologies like automatic sailor mills have made one's task much easier as compared to the old sailor mills. Furthermore, Gadgets like automatic digital watches are replacing the old watches. Another example is digital thermometer, which has completely replaced the old mercury thermometer. For the sake of the task to make lot easier, human beings have created all of those technologies with betterment as compared to the old ones. Now a days, people are relying more on those new invented conveniences rather than depending on the old ones due to many more reasons. One major reason for this dependency is that it is taking a lot less time than the outdated ones. In today’s world, where there is full of hustle, people don't want to waste the unwanted times on any other things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...onment. The prompt, however argues that this conveniences and luxuries are limiting ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...and luxuries are limiting the growth of an individuals. But I mostly disagree with the authors...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 392, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...r mills have made ones task much easier as compared to the old sailor mills. Furth...
^^
Line 2, column 753, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...betterment as compared to the old ones. Now a days, people are relying more on those new i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 757, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...erment as compared to the old ones. Now a days, people are relying more on those new i...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1042, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
..., where there is full of hustle, people dont want to waste the unwanted times on any...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 266.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79972984329 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556390977444 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 704.065955056 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1771340266 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.97078651685 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106847429785 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411541633794 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439451036958 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947498570935 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249427545992 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.