In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
During the exploration of science, many inquiry fields is uncovered. Newly discovered field provides considerable chance to everyone and equal to both beginner and expert. Someone may agree that beginners are more likely to make important contributions than those experts. However, I do not agree about this statement. Everyone in the inquiry field is able to make important contributions and opportunity is equal to everyone.
First of all, both beginners and experts are new to the inquiry field, everyone is on the same start line so there is no conception of expert and everyone performed as beginner. Both beginners and experts have equal chance to discover and make contributions. However, when experts get to known the structure of the inquiry field, they will able to make up a plan and help themselves sole the problem and finally make important contributions. Comparing with those experts, beginners is keep trying any possibilities and hardly make significant achievements.
What’s more, maybe someone will argue that experts in new field may trapped by experience in their own field while beginners can take advantage of their imagination. However, experts are able to find out the similarities between the unknown field and the field they researching while beginners are just wandering without directions and try the possible solutions to work out the problem. With the knowledge in discovered fields, experts are more likely to make important contributions. just like rolling a dice and the possibility is extremely low.
Last but not least, maybe beginners sometimes will provide some useful ideas, but before these ideas, this method is just like rolling a dice and the possibility is extremely low. Since thousands of ideas was thought by beginners, there may only few possible and can make great contributions. Once one of their ideas is able to solve the problem, their significant contributions will be focused. Comparing with those experts instructed with the knowledge in their field, beginners is just bumbling around and almost impossible to make important contribution.
In any inquiry field, the opportunity is equal to everyone no matter you are beginner or expert. To make significant contributions, everyone should take the chance and compare unknown field and known field to find out similarities to solve the problem of the field. With hard working and directions, everyone is able to make important contribution in inquiry field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to sole' or 'sole'.
Suggestion: to sole; sole
...e to make up a plan and help themselves sole the problem and finally make important ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Just
...likely to make important contributions. just like rolling a dice and the possibility...
^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: DIE_DICE[1]
Message: 'die' is the singular form of 'dice'. Consider using 'die'?
Suggestion: die
...tant contributions. just like rolling a dice and the possibility is extremely low. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put between 'will' and 'provide'.
Suggestion: will sometimes provide
... Last but not least, maybe beginners sometimes will provide some useful ideas, but before these ide...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: DIE_DICE[1]
Message: 'die' is the singular form of 'dice'. Consider using 'die'?
Suggestion: die
...eas, this method is just like rolling a dice and the possibility is extremely low. S...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37017994859 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95257617489 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442159383033 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4370541701 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.45 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.45 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531942505481 0.243740707755 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178872228248 0.0831039109588 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109809032566 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342061271659 0.150359130593 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981074100643 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.