To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Leader's have the power that can affect the society. Being a leader not only indicates making big decisions, it also means having the responsibility to protect his/her people and enabling them to live a proper life. People's lives and welfare depends on the decisions leaders make. Due to this, I believe that the leaders should have high ethical and moral standards unlike the laypersons.
First of all, being a leader requires them to have the ability to consider every single person's welfare and how his/her decision would affect the society. Leaders are chosen based on the people's votes, which indicates that people expect the leader to present policies that helps them live a better life. If the leaders can't provide what the people want, what is the purpose of voting for and having a leader? Leaders should try their best to help people who voted for him/her to eradicate the problems people are facing and enable them to live a better life. This is of course is essential for the nation to prosper, too. People who are well taken care of and are satisfied with their lives also has more time and energy to work industriously and make the nation bloom with happiness and economical success. If the leaders do not have high ethical and moral standards, there is a high possibility of them making decisions only for their selfish minds and taking care of other people's welfare, causing the whole nation to deteriorate.
Furthermore, the decisions leaders make have excessive influence on the society. Leaders have the power to make the nation prosper by helping the country import many goods and making abound profits but also have the power to diminish what the nation has. Such power can be quite compelling and can make one person get easily obsessed with it, causing them to exploit and utilize power in malignant ways. It can be used to satisfy one's selfish purposes without being concerned with other people's welfare. However, for a leader to have strong resistance towards such power, he/she would have to have ethical and moral standards unlike any other layperson. There is one example I would like to present, who didn't have high moral standards and exploited power to pursue his/her morbid needs, Hitler. Hitler caused many macabre slaughters and tried to exterminate certain races with the power of a leader. If he had certain degree of moral standards, he would not have ordered such malignant decisions and could have actually utilized his power to do better goods for the society.
To sum up, being a leader and having the power to influence the society can easily obscure the leader's minds and make them become selfish and use the power to pursue his/her malady minds. Also, as they are chosen to be leader based on people's expectations, helping people to live a better life, they should try to meet such expectations. Which is why leaders require certain degree of ethical and moral standards, in order to have strong resistance towards exploiting power and precluding themselves from impairing the people and the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...them live a better life. If the leaders cant provide what the people want, what is t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 789, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ake the nation bloom with happiness and economical success. If the leaders do not have hig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ne example I would like to present, who didnt have high moral standards and exploited...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, of course, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2532.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92607003891 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37620887237 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431906614786 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 803.7 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3647949944 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.090909091 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126373419444 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524011582678 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299406522353 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102207186269 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014250470409 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.