The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Youth is an integral part of the society. It can be considered a building block of the society. Youth is responsible for shaping the future of the society. It also plays an cardinal role in contributing to the impression of the society to the third party. A leader is an important pillar in an organization. The way the leader leads the organization decides it growth or demise in the long run. I agree with the given assertion, that the best way to prepare the youth for the leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a quality or sense of cooperation, not the competition. In the following paragraphs we dig deeper into the issue while providing compelling arguments to espouse the stand taken.
In an environment where there exists cooperation, there exists coziness and comfortability. For an employee, these characteristics are essential for best output. If a leader is successful in embedding these characteristics in the environment around the organization, in my opinion, he is already on a head start as far as competition with its rival organization. If a leader is cooperative, he will encourage the employees and subordinates to find a solution to the forecoming challenges as a team, thus finding an optimal solution, thus taking organization to new heights.
If leader believes in maintaining a competitive environment, there is a greater chance that this might lead to an unhealthy competitive environment. Employees in this kind of atmosphere will be competing among themselves. Thus, putting the organization on a downhill. In lack of cooperation by the leader, the employees may be mislead.
Although, if someone wants an exponential growth of an organization, it is usually seen in a competitive environment created by a leader who instills the characteristics of competition rather than cooperation. If someone wants to risk a healthy environment for an exponential growth, competitiveness might be the right choice.
To sum up, it really depends on the class of employees that an organization is withholding. If the employees are phlegmatic enough to withstand an competitive environment then leader must opt for competitive way of leadership. But if the employees want a healthy environment to work in, then the leader must cooperative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...he future of the society. It also plays an cardinal role in contributing to the im...
^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... For an employee, these characteristics are essential for best output. If a lead...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... taking organization to new heights. If leader believes in maintaining a compet...
^^
Line 9, column 145, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...yees are phlegmatic enough to withstand an competitive environment then leader mus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, still, then, third, thus, while, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25203252033 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47182078451 2.79657885939 124% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50135501355 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.8590711314 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2857142857 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191341244755 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598463079473 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129111683183 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101476259761 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956643311401 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.