The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Nowadays, environmental harms evoked by disposables mainly from customer merchandises are being serious problems worldwide. The following essay will argue that limiting household garbage by local authority can alleviate consumer generated waste.
Admittedly, the author’s claim that setting strict limits might hold true under certain circumstances may be beneficial because it may motivate people to produce less garbage. Products, first mostly produced at factories owned by companies, are eventually consumed and become wastes, and this process is held in each households. Thus, direct regulation of amount of garbage produced privately, cause immediate decrease of waste. For example, South Korea, has introduced pricing garbage bag in late two thousands. It has dramatically dropped nationwide waste volume, with private milting effect. Likewise, separate collection can be optimal choice. By considering which materials are collectible, it functions as impediment for making wastes, thus general citizens hesitates to make garbage. Accordingly, based on above reasons and examples, the author’s claim can be agreed to a certain degree.
However, the author’s assertion that restraining domestic waste, may not always be true at certain circumstances such regulations may also be ineffective because…. Recently, with rising concept of green growth, companies also needs to deal with environmental issues. Basically, a company exist to make profit, not to maintain environment. According to this fact, without restricting companies, they would make non ecological choice that can harm environment by producing environment unfriendly merchandise. For example, before limiting Freon gas at Paris convention, electro device makers used freon gas as cooling material for refrigerator or air conditioner. This deprived customers to choose environment sustainable machine, finally imposed to trash harmful waste. Similarly, limiting carbon emission, can lessen hazardous effects for environment, especially air. Kyoto protocol, convention before Paris, has positive effects about decreasing carbon wastes for restraining production itself. For this reason, contrary to the author’s claim, regulating companies is also important in order to reduce negative effect for environment.
Furthermore, Even if these regulations are enforced correctly, regulation itself needs bolstering forces; regulations may not be the best approach because changing w hat people think could be more effective. For sure, regulations forces people by multifaceted punishment. On the other hands, social movement, can makes people choose their decision voluntarily. For instance, Sweden, has nation widely holding campaign with sense of remaining good environment to descendants, which is also inherited by ascendants also. This makes Swedish customers to inspect products meticulously to minimize effect made by products, and thus makes companies to make unharmful decision in time promotes innovation in the industry to keep improving and reducing waste.
In conclusion, while the author’s claim might seem beneficial in certain conditions, counter points such as regulating companies, and changing what people think, the authors’ claim cannot be agreed in full.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecause it may motivate people to produce less garbage. Products, first mostly pro...
^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... It has dramatically dropped nationwide waste volume, with private milting effec...
^^
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Freon) must be used with a third-person verb: 'gases', 'gasses'.
Suggestion: gases; gasses
...ise. For example, before limiting Freon gas at Paris convention, electro device mak...
^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (freon) must be used with a third-person verb: 'gases', 'gasses'.
Suggestion: gases; gasses
...ntion, electro device makers used freon gas as cooling material for refrigerator or...
^^^
Line 3, column 843, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ission, can lessen hazardous effects for environment, especially air. Kyoto proto...
^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons may not be the best approach because changing w hat people think could be mor...
^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...n the other hands, social movement, can makes people choose their decision voluntaril...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 514, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
..., which is also inherited by ascendants also. This makes Swedish customers to inspec...
^^^^
Line 4, column 593, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nspect products meticulously to minimize effect made by products, and thus makes ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, may, similarly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2817.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12391304348 5.05705443957 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07380157845 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632608695652 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 876.6 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3187658334 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.68 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15234935207 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427857679923 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386478098191 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873616747075 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687340103397 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 48.8420337079 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 12.1743820225 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.1639044944 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.38706741573 123% => OK
difficult_words: 169.0 100.480337079 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.