The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
In the given prompt, it is depicted that best way to teach is to praise the positive actions and ignore negative actions. This prompt states that if a person has done something wrong or in negative sense it can be ignored by others. But this argument is full of holes and bullets in it as by ignoring the negative actions we are encouraging these activities for such people. I am completely against by the argument suggested in prompt. Numerous valid examples will be provided to support the side for an argument.
At first, let’s take example of a Mahatma Gandhi, also known as Father of Nation of India. In his childhood, he was notorious member of the family. Once he stole some coins from his father’s coat to buy something. But he felt very sad for this and wrote a letter to his dad promising him that he will never repeat such things in future and will always the path of truthfulness and non-violence. After this his father call him and hugged him very tight and give him some importance lessons of life. In this way, the negative actions are not ignored by his father and later he was known for his work for the freedom movement of India.
Additionally, in another example one of my good friend committed a blunder mistake because he bought a laptop on loan with telling his parents in college. However, he has no earning source due to which it is very difficult for him to pay monthly instalment of the laptop. Thus, one day his father checked his bank account-passbook and found about the wrong deeds carried by him. He was very much angry on him at first. Afterwards, he forgives him because my friend realized his mistake about negative actions and thus understand the importance of positive action in life.
In converse, according to Department of Psychology in Harvard University they found that the ignorance of negative action by parents is an important factor that their child is more notorious child as compare to other. Because he gets confidence that nobody is watching him and he gets the confidence over this. To avoid this situation, parents are requested to talk to their children regarding this as a friend not as in role of parent.
In conclusion, it can be depicted that negative actions ignored by any person irrespective of their ages should not be ignored. The proper care should be taken for such people and they should be awarded with wisdom to avoid such negative actions and positive actions should be praised. Thus, it will increase there moral confidence and encourage them to perform more positive actions. Many examples were provided to prove the validity of side.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77092511013 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60098865028 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497797356828 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1940337481 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1739130435 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7391304348 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82608695652 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22590921605 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072501811131 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136205987265 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136847465399 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106891033811 0.0667264976115 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.