The best way to teach—whether as an educator, employer, or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The issue states that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. To a certain extent I disagree with the issue because if a person’s parent, educator or employer does not point out their negative actions, they cannot improve upon their negative traits.
The role of an educator, employer and parent is very important in a person’s life. They guide a person through their life. If they only praise a person for their positive actions and ignore their negative actions it would make the person think that everything that they do is always right and they would become full of themselves. For example if an educator praises students for their good work but doesn’t scold their students if they fight and ignores it, it would have a bad impact on their lives and students would feel that it is okay to fight. This would have a negative impact on the student’s life and so the teacher should point out and scold the students for their negative actions. However, if the mistake has happened unknowingly then the educator may ignore it or just tell the student so that he does not do it again.
As a parent, you want your child to be able to distinguish between what is right and what is wrong. When they do something wrong, parents need to teach their children and make them understand what they did was wrong so that they never repeat it. For example if parents always reward their child for getting good grades or for helping someone but ignore it if the child eggs someone’s house or break someone’s window, the child would think that what they are doing is not wrong and would continue doing it. Parents need to scold the child if they are going in the wrong direction and make them understand the consequences. On the other hand, if the mistake is small and the child realizes on his own that what he did was wrong, the negative action could be ignored sometimes.
A person should definitely be praised for his good actions and every person has some negatives, if the people guiding them point them out, the person can improve upon them and become a better person. An employer wants good work and efficiency for the company. He should always encourage his employees and praise them when they do good work but if they are not told and stopped on their negative actions, it might have a negative impact for the company. An employer needs to make sure that all his employees are working for the betterment of the company. While working people are tend to make mistakes but the employer should tell the person so that he does not repeat the mistake and he can get better at his job.
Educators, employers and parents play a very important role in shaping a person’s life so they should point out and tell the person of their negative actions as well as praise them on their good work so that a person can grow in their career and become a better human being.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 33.0505617978 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65192307692 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39201627584 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.371153846154 0.4932671777 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4566035377 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.315789474 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3684210526 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132105715039 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614375204031 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071354169957 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101049816096 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760832336317 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.38706741573 81% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.