Claim: In any field - business, politics, education, government - those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership
Leadership is the ability of one to push the organization towards the path of success by maintaining the pleasant environment surrounding the organization. In this author claims that the leader of any field should step down after 5 years because the only path of success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. I personally disagree with this claim due to some of the below mentioned reasons.
First, If the person who is in the power of any organization would have vital experience in the field, they are working in. They would be rooted within the mission and goal of their organization. They would be knowing each and every aspect of their organization. So, to step down after serving 5 years to an organization will not only hamper the reputation of the organization but will also impact the success path of an organizations. If we explore history then there would be only a few instances where this type of rule would have benefitted the success of the organization.
Secondly, If the new leader will take over command of an organization, then it will take some time for the new one to understand the eco system of the organization. Thus the process of being comfortable to lead the organization for the new leader would not be easy process. It can happens that the new leader brings new rules for the organization then it will also be difficult for the employees working under them to being flexible with this process. It can also negatively affect the success of an organization.
We have to understand here than if we change the leader body the employee or staff working under it still needed to be same. So to consider them to be flexible to adapt the changes brought by new leader is not feasible thinking. For example Nikon camera had the policy to change its CEO after frequent interval of time and new CEO always come with new sets of rule and idea. Now if this rules can be adapted by the employee it will be good but if it did not get set with them than there will be downfall of the company which is was happened with Nikon.
The author had provided the supportive reason that changing the leadership is the path of success for any organization and it can be true for some of the sectors like government, but this cannot be hold true for all the sectors. For example, in the business sector it will be hard if we change the CEO of the company every 5 year for the company to survive in this competitive market.
Thus, the author claims to implement this rule for every sector is worthless to be considered. I think if the one is getting success with the leadership shown for any organization than it should be considered to be continued for the interval until the organizations sees the downfall or if leader to step down willingly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...sonally disagree with this claim due to some of the below mentioned reasons. First, If t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... goal of their organization. They would be knowing each and every aspect of their organiza...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an organization' or simply 'organizations'?
Suggestion: an organization; organizations
...ut will also impact the success path of an organizations. If we explore history then there would...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t the success path of an organizations. If we explore history then there would be ...
^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...and the eco system of the organization. Thus the process of being comfortable to lea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
...eader would not be easy process. It can happens that the new leader brings new rules fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... adapt the changes brought by new leader is not feasible thinking. For example Ni...
^^
Line 7, column 527, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...e will be downfall of the company which is was happened with Nikon. The author ...
^^
Line 7, column 530, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ill be downfall of the company which is was happened with Nikon. The author had ...
^^^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...any organization and it can be true for some of the sectors like government, but this canno...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66463414634 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74525636575 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408536585366 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8550937728 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243257137881 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895601353643 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12464424604 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167130166163 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121170342628 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.