Claim in any field business, politics, education, government those in power should step down after five years Reason.
The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
It is said that in different work contexts, such as politics, business and government work, individuals who are in power should leave their position after five years. While the change in the management may help the improvement of efficiency and effectiveness of institutions, I believe that this activity is not applicable and useful all the time.
I can explain why it is reasonable to update the leadership appropriately. All people can be a source of experience, innovative ideas and creativity. They can have the most important role in the reinforcement of productivity of their companies. However, the question that should be considered is" how long such people can render new and novel ideas, and how long such ideas can be practical?" Some people are naturally talented and know how to keep the positive trend of their management. For example, the founder of Microsoft is someone who all the time tries to keep up with time and attempts to increase his knowledge to expand the scope of his ideas. With this method, he has been managing the Microsoft company for more than 10 years. Bill Gates is still requested to continue his management. We can see that Microsoft is one of the most powerful companies and most of the time it is the leader in the technology market.
However, there is evidence that sometimes the existence of fixed and lifelong managers can cause increased corruption and inefficiency. This is because after a while the trite methods and old ideas of such people may not be compatible with modern life. This situation may push them to spend huge sums of money to compensate for damages imposed on their companies. Sometimes, fixed managers cannot add anything new and turn their companies into static things that do not have any profit. Also, according to my experience, sometimes such people might be tempted to rob the remaining budget to support their lives.
Additionally, we have to consider that the new leadership always is not the surest path to success. Renovation of leadership does not necessarily bring innovation and maintain the same level of productivity as the previous leader. For example, during the presidency of Trump, all of the corrections performed by Obama were cancelled because of some political and ideological differences. Another example is related to the presidency of Ahmadinejad who caused the economic recession and all of the eight-year efforts of the previous president, namely Khatami, were spoiled.
In conclusion, in my view, changing or not changing of management does not ensure success. This should be done according to the existing conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...xample, during the presidency of Trump, all of the corrections performed by Obama were can...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 487, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d who caused the economic recession and all of the eight-year efforts of the previous pres...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 2260.96107784 98% => OK
No of words: 428.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16355140187 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94821301749 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 204.123752495 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528037383178 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.072723204 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.238095238 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.70786347227 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133823810831 0.218282227539 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380046208292 0.0743258471296 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464388772411 0.0701772020484 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742438890288 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030574920735 0.0628817314937 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.3799401198 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 98.500998004 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.