Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers

Collaboration and team work are vital for a student for his long successful career. It is from the minor things they explore more in the coming period. Working in a group allow them to act as a team player and help them in developing inter personal skills. I strongly agree with the fact that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture using three reasons.
Firstly, doing projects enhances one's view towards a subject. For instance, when a student is given a task to complete a project on biology he/she would explore more than the amount of knowledge that is shared in a classroom. While working together the cooperation between the peers also enhances and they collectively work together to achieve a common goal by making strategies together.
In addition, the concentration of a student is not consistent. To give an example, it is proved in the research that a student can concentrate on a particular task for a maximum for 30 minutes and to achieve better results they have to take a break and continue again. If one given a lecture about a topic of about 1 hour then he wouldn't be able to grasp the entire subject with concentration. They would be chances of missing the information at a large extant. If project study is administered in such cases then they would keep an effort to learn more.
Lastly, lecturer can also miss some topics which he intended to teach because of a busy schedule or due to lack of time. Implementing a project might actually benefit in such cases and one gets a complete view of benefits and flaws practically. If they study theoretically they can only visualize instead during development they can actually see the results produced which created a greater impact.
To conclude, many will say that projects are waste of time and only developed the topper in the group making other relaxed. But in many cases students who had little knowledge gained from those who are performing better and in turn showing a great erudition in the particular subject. Assignments enhances skills and logical thinking approach towards a problem and develops a realistic solution.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...oping inter personal skills. I strongly agree with the fact that students must work together to complete...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ave to take a break and continue again. If one given a lecture about a topic of ab...
^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...e about a topic of about 1 hour then he wouldnt be able to grasp the entire subject wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sing the information at a large extant. If project study is administered in such c...
^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...view of benefits and flaws practically. If they study theoretically they can only ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, in many cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90163934426 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76230994575 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565573770492 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.63417038 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246124116226 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723922535222 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979388809363 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135462715846 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114372645373 0.0667264976115 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.