Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o

Essay topics:

Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.

Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

In our society, where media coverage is ubiquitous, some people claim that it is no longer possible to regard any living man or woman as a hero, as the reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny would eventually be diminished. From my perspective of view, it is undoubted that people's reputation would be exacerbated under excessive media coverage; However, not all of media could make endeavor to do so and people have different channels to eschew with such biases. Even if people's repute has been actually impacted by such slanders, we might still consider them as hero for their certain precious properties.

To start off, as Alexander Poes said "to err is a man", human being is apt to err in either life or work. It is possible that when every perspectives of one man have been open to the public, his/her repute could be comparably diminished. Because under such situation, any minor flaws could be discovered and exposed to the public. Therefore, it is relatively easy to find something which could breach with the social norms. For example, a war hero, who are willing to risk his/her life to fight with fascism demon, might be addicted with smoking publicly, which could be considered as a insolent behavior in environmentalists. Furthermore, we can precluded that certain media agencies want to leverage such chance to make sensation for the sake of winning the potential profits.

However, the assumption that every media could focus on the negative part of heroes to denigrate them for their own purpose might stay incorrect. First of all, it is understandable that every media agency just has limited resource and have to balance the cost and output for their effort. If they find that they are not capable of affording to scrutinize every details of target hero, or the target effect of report could only reach a weak degree for propagation purpose, such behavior could become meaningless for them. Moreover, even if some medias choose to do so, we are inclined to believe that not all media could tend to go for the same biases report, because a mass of independent media agencies in America still stick to their impartiality and objective goal for news reporting.

Last, even if people's flaws are disclosed by media to the public, such revelation might not necessary lead to their deterioration of repute. To understand this point, we have to revisit the definition of hero. Normally, hero represents who possess certain characteristics that could be admired by majority of people, such as courage, intelligence, self-sacrifice, and so on, which doesn't require perfection for an all-flawless person. Looking back to our war hero's case, although smoking in public is definitely bad exemplary from either environmentalists or education of young man perspective, the essential characteristic that enable him to be hero is his admirable behavior to make struggles with denoms and protect people from tramples. In case that media scrutiny or slanders from any channels doesn't endanger his gallant picture during war, we are still disposed to believe that he could be still and worth as the great hero in people's mind.

In summary, we have to admit the powerful role of modern media and delicate report on the derogative part of examplaries could diminish their prestige, because man is naturally imperfect and such foibles or faults could not match with the expected positive image. However, not all media coverages would like to follow such approach to blindly focus on the dark part of heros. In addition, granted that the medias indeed did so, people might still consider those examplaries as heroes, as they essentially own some necessary heolic characteristics.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is ubiquitous, some people claim that it is no longer possible to regard any livi...
^^
Line 7, column 596, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... publicly, which could be considered as a insolent behavior in environmentalists....
^
Line 7, column 658, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'preclude'
Suggestion: preclude
... environmentalists. Furthermore, we can precluded that certain media agencies want to lev...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 382, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...gence, self-sacrifice, and so on, which doesnt require perfection for an all-flawless ...
^^^^^^
Line 15, column 800, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... scrutiny or slanders from any channels doesnt endanger his gallant picture during war...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in summary, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.9520958084 170% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 13.6137724551 154% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 28.8173652695 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 55.5748502994 146% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3115.0 2260.96107784 138% => OK
No of words: 609.0 441.139720559 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11494252874 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.56307096286 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83711151799 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 306.0 204.123752495 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502463054187 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 990.0 705.55239521 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 2.70958083832 406% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7933747068 57.8364921388 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.333333333 119.503703932 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 23.324526521 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.70786347227 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232694498034 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766440404476 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886533657537 0.0701772020484 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141292785953 0.128457276422 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815432539445 0.0628817314937 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.3799401198 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.3550499002 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 98.500998004 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.