The above statement claim that problems of modern society would not completely solve by introducing laws and legal system because laws fails to change the mind of people and whatever they believe. I mostly disagree with the claim and provided reason and I will explain my reasons.
First of all, democracy and parliament system is a valuable contribution of humankind in recent centuries. This governing system is designed to be adopted by the changing needs of the society. There are lots of rules that are abandoned these days due to changing the situations and changing the needs of the society. For instance, there was an alcohol prohibition in the United States before second war but when the parliament understood that this prohibition could lead to crime, they decide to cancel this law. Thus, the legal system could be plastic for different needs in different era.
Moreover, parliament system is flexible to every scope of everyday life so they could adapt the laws of the country with modern problems. For instance, after conducting some crime in social media in Iran, the government decides to introduce laws in related to them. Then, any people that do crime in this area would be arrested by police and the court would decide about his or her crime. Therefore, legal system could adjust itself with continues changing problems in the modern society.
The reason maintains that law could not change the mind and heart beliefs of people. I could not accept this idea. I believe in long term laws and parallelly cultural activities could change the beliefs of a society. For instance, before introducing the freedom of black people in the United States, it had not been acceptable for a lot of people that blacks have the same right as others. This law ensures that black people could live freely in the country and any people that try to limit their freedom would be punished by laws and legal system. After long period, these days blacks’ rights are acceptable for most of people in the United States.
In conclusion, I could not agree with the claim and the reason because I believe parliament and legal system are flexible to adjust the rules according to the needs of the society. In addition, by introducing laws and cultural activities changing minds of people would be possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 613, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... days blacks’ rights are acceptable for most of people in the United States. In conclusion, I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92030848329 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46783419002 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449871465296 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0673633269 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.736842105 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282480671407 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101151633744 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809858438411 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20288068632 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962909260377 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.