Claim: people can understand the character of a society by men and women that a society chooses as its Heros or role models.
Reason: Heros and role models are the society's highest ideal.
The author of the issue claims that men and woman that a society choose as its hero or role model can best describe the character and hallmarks of a society. He further reasons that the society's highest ideal is distinguishable by Heroes and role models. Personally, I refute the rationale behind both the claim and the reason. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons that shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that people have an inevitable tendency to choose men and women as their role models or Heroes because they play a consequential role in any given society. Broadly speaking, in today's hectic city of life, people's lives are not ideal to describe the character of a society. As a palpable example, celebrities are the epitome of success for many thanks to the publicity they receive from social media and are more often than not imitated by those who have an insatiable desire for fame. But celebrities' lives are not ideal owing to the fact that they do not make a secret of alcohol, drug abuse, short-term relationships and so forth. So, hardly can these immoral behaviors help people to understand the real character of a society. To elucidate more on this issue, such behaviors cannot provide an opportunity for people to realize what the culture or a society is.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is the life of politicians that many people choose them as their Heroes. If we take a minute to ponder over it, vast majorities of politicians and the government before the election represent a true character, committed, hard-working attitudes and so forth. But after the election, their personalities totally change and they forget what they have said. If people choose these kinds of people as their heroes or role models, such negative features will be soon widespread in the whole society. So, we cannot say that these traits are the highest ideal of a society. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that human beings should not rely on their heroes and role models if they want to understand the character of the society where they live due to the fact that people's characteristics are changing at a very swift pace and their habits are not stable.
As far as the reason is concerned, it should be pointed out that Heroes and role models are not able to show the society's highest ideal because there are several factors which describe the highest ideal like welfare and well-being of people living in the society. Indeed, the society and the government should bend over backward or make efforts to improve living standards in the society owing to the fact that people need to live in a flourished and a thrived society. That being so, despite the popularity of Heroes and role models in any given society, hardly can they show what the culture or a society is.
Having scrutinized both the claim and the reason, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'societys the highest'.
Suggestion: societys the highest
... a society. He further reasons that the societys highest ideal is distinguishable by Heroes and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'societys the highest'.
Suggestion: societys the highest
...nd role models are not able to show the societys highest ideal because there are several factors...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e claim and the reason, I reiterate that
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, broadly speaking
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2499.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80576923077 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60538174808 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467307692308 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 807.3 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7399992394 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.95 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458897535429 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143667165657 0.0831039109588 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135201069104 0.0758088955206 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269520894508 0.150359130593 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130482370409 0.0667264976115 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.