Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit

Essay topics:

Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

There’s an assertion that all college faculty should spend time and effort working on the courses they teach. I do agree with the view, as working outside the academic world not only enables faculty to teach their students more effectively, but also improves their academic work indirectly.

Admittedly, when facing a lot of burden on research, college professors may not have sufficient time to learn relevant skills to the courses they teach. As we all know, the evaluation system for college faculty is totally different from teachers in primary or secondary school. The most important thing for college teachers is to public more papers and make a real contribution to the advancement of science. If college authorities force all faculty to receive extra training like teaching skills, their main focus, the academic work, may be severely affected.

However, although college professors focus more on the academic world, they should also take some responsibility for teaching their students. Almost every college professor will at least have one or two courses to teach. If professors don’t receive related training, which is important for them to be qualified, their classes may be boring, and thereby students are not able to acquire useful knowledge to make them more competitive in the job market and in their future career. Also, the college will have a bad reputation an be regarded as a place where its professors are irresponsible for their students. Therefore, the importance of attending teaching training and being a qualified teacher should be emphasised for all faculty.

Moreover, the time professors spend outside the academic world can be regarded as an opportunity to relax themselves from the tough academic research. As we all know, many research works are related to some fundamental theoretical fields, which require a lot of time and efforts to figure out. However, people’s working efficiency faces a downward slope if they focus on one thing for too long. It means that people need to have a rest or do other things to avoid useless work on one field. Thus, working outside the academic world from time to time is definitely a great chance for the faculty to escape from tough academic world. It may have an unexpected benefit for their research after they revitalise their minds.

Summing up, although participating training relevant to the courses may occupy professors' spare time, it is necessary to do this, as teaching is one of their obligations, and helps them to avert the low efficiency trap for working too long in academic research at a time.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...ra training like teaching skills, their main focus, the academic work, may be severely aff...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the college will have a bad reputation an be regarded as a place where its profes...
^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the college will have a bad reputation an be regarded as a place where its professor...
^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'at least']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220125786164 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.163522012579 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0943396226415 0.0880659088768 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0566037735849 0.0497285424764 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0545073375262 0.0444667217837 123% => OK
Prepositions: 0.102725366876 0.12292977631 84% => OK
Participles: 0.041928721174 0.0406280797675 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75382763914 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.041928721174 0.030933414821 136% => OK
Particles: 0.0041928721174 0.0016655270985 252% => OK
Determiners: 0.0880503144654 0.0997080785238 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0230607966457 0.0249443105267 92% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0083857442348 0.0148568991511 56% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2604.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 423.0 452.878318584 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15602836879 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385342789598 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31914893617 0.280924506359 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210401891253 0.200843997647 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125295508274 0.132149295362 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75382763914 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 219.290929204 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 54.1400612757 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5 23.380412469 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0882246333 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.666666667 141.124799967 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.380412469 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.611111111111 0.674092028746 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 55.414893617 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.32824427481 1.64882698954 81% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457987748348 0.391690518653 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0868838163022 0.123202303941 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0538892828316 0.077325440228 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.521906043416 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17586188636 0.149214159877 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184449326053 0.161403998019 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920689363621 0.0892212321368 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.382078542823 0.385218514788 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0503241423747 0.0692045440612 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32812602475 0.275328986314 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398074583865 0.0653680567796 61% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.