Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.

Essay topics:

Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.

Managaement of any organization whether it is public or private has no right to invade the privacy of their employees. Privacy is a fundamental right of every citizen as provided by the Consititution of that country. In my opinion, management should opt other methods to keep the check on the activites of their employes in reltation to company work and to prevent the company from any kind of lawsuit. To bolster of point of view I am to going to present few point on this.

Firstly, as organization's one major concern is that people use the company resources for their personal uses and benifits. Well, it is an expected part from employee side. As person spend their crucial working hours at job so they might not get sufficient time to complete their other responsibilities like bills, purchase of medicines. If a person avail the resources near to them to fulfill their day to day chores then there is no harm in it. Infact, authority should be relaxed on this behalf because instead of going out of the office they are finishing their jobs while sitting at the desk.

Secondly, every one working in such resouceful offices are well aware of the fact theat if they misuse such resources atlast they are the suffrers only, hence it represents the narrow disposition on the behalf of company management that they even think about such pity matters. Instead of this, organization should provide more facilities to their working staff. This will encourage workers to achieve execeelecnt results in their respective fields. At the end of the day, people are in the offices to work and they expect the best working enviornment. For example, google, and facebook such major firms have quite different working spaces, their people are allowed to work at any of place either in cafe or in their resting capsules, consequentially results so obtained from employess are unparallel.

Third, treacherous behaviour of any person cannot be determind just mere looking at their mails or browsing history. As the individaul is well intelligent enough to hide all such resources precisely. So, by scrutinizing the mails of all workers, company is wasting their own resouces with precious time. Such behaviour not only damages the trust of employess but also effects their working efficiencies. As published in a research, a person spend maximmum time of their life at their work place, so the ambience of that place have a major impact on individual's personality. Hence, mileu of place should be cogenial and trustworhty. Here not only co-workers camadierrie but also there is bond between decision authority and prople doing their jobs.

Albeit, scant incidences are their in existance where employess deviates from their core work and starts using the provided resouces lavishly, whether it is stationary or internet or other facilities so provided. In such cases, individual is not only perdify but also denigrate themselves.Also they breach the code of conduct for privcy of compancy matters, but such cases can be handled with other methods. It

To recaptulate, if any organization is working according to the standards procedures with ethics then management of that organizatioon should not invest their critical time and energy to spy on their employess, because in case if any files lawsuit, then board members should be bold enough to face it professionally.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of lawsuit. To bolster of point of view I am to going to present few point on th...
^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ties like bills, purchase of medicines. If a person avail the resources near to th...
^^
Line 13, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing at their mails or browsing history. As the individaul is well intelligent enou...
^^
Line 13, column 550, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ce of that place have a major impact on individuals personality. Hence, mileu of place shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 290, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...y perdify but also denigrate themselves.Also they breach the code of conduct for pri...
^^^^
Line 19, column 290, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...y perdify but also denigrate themselves.Also they breach the code of conduct for pri...
^^^^
Line 19, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es can be handled with other methods. It To recaptulate, if any organization is w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'files'' or 'file's'?
Suggestion: files'; file's
...their employess, because in case if any files lawsuit, then board members should be b...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, third, well, while, for example, kind of, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2831.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 552.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12862318841 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82310089365 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51268115942 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 879.3 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3457020217 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.958333333 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29166666667 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173499458673 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566930904419 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598465645344 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969996058567 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291744024683 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.