Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
The prompt here suggests that company X should interfere into the emails of its employees and should look out for any wastage of time and company's resources are misused or not. I disagree with the author on this statement because it is based on a very broad assumptions and may have negative effects if the fails to do so.
First of all, the biggest problem is that this method will if not create will be stepping block in the hostile work place environment. This hostile work place environment may yield better result than the results which are currently given by the employees of that company X but there is also a greater amount of chance that this procedure may lead to the bad results for the company X which may happen as the employees may feel less secure than they normally do. This may may look to the top officers of the company like result of "wastage of time and resources" and may start having more scrutinized inspections. This may lead to even greater downfall the company X would ever imagine and may also result into the plummeting of the stock prices of the company thus resulting into the total demise.
Secondly of all, consider that the company X has a very harsh monitoring environment. Than the employees may find that they may not even have interest into their jobs anymore and this may lead into the exclusion and depart of a large employees of the company X which may even be vital part of the organisation.
Thirdly, why the conclusion has attenuating logical reasoning is the fact that the hostile and antagonistic environment of the company may also lead it into the downfall as creating a hostile environment may trigger the company X's competitors to design or structure a layout of their organisation such that, it may well be less hostile than company X's environment and the people who work there may leave company X for the better development of their careers and their overall life.
Additionally, The employees may feel like the measures taken by company X are completely blasphemy and ridiculous. They may also feel like the these steps which involve monitoring of the employees to save time and resources cause violation of privacy which can lead to the exclusion of some vital employees from company X. So in my opinion it is not only a violation and invasion of the privacy but may also lead into the downfall of company X's demise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: may
...less secure than they normally do. This may may look to the top officers of the company...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rt having more scrutinized inspections. This may lead to even greater downfall the c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ead to even greater downfall the company X would ever imagine and may also result...
^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...as a very harsh monitoring environment. Than the employees may find that they may no...
^^^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'employee'?
Suggestion: employee
...nto the exclusion and depart of a large employees of the company X which may even be vita...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77163461538 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66068199697 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432692307692 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.406922929 60.3974514979 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.416666667 118.986275619 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6666666667 23.4991977007 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.21951772744 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192734899342 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971925697441 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595017502332 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130948156672 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215567681061 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.1392134831 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.