Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits
Managment bears the repsonsibility for protecting the company for lawsuits by anticiapting the risks which may be caused by employees negligence. Routine monitoring not only helps tackle that negligence but, also makes employees more alert to the threat. Monitoring email correspondance can be benificial in providing management some insight into cost cutting solution. Hence, the use of routine monitoring for all employee email correspondance o is a good strategy.
In a myraids of situations, negligence can be the sole factor for breach for company's classified information, which may later serve to denigrate the reputation of the company. The most common cyber attacks like phishing and spamming are so wide spread that the employees of a company as well as the general public needs to be extemely catuious while interaction. If an employees mistakenly corresponds with a impersonsator instead of a client,the company suffers from multiple lawsuits from a client. Routine monitoring as well as awareness seminars conduted for every employee has the potential to mitigate the risk. Though, the company may incur extra costs for routine monitoring but money and reputation, more weightage must be given to reputation as it would ensure new clients as well as surging profits year over year.
The big four consultancy companies i.e. Deloitte, KPMG, Pwc and EY are already investing huge amount in fighting phishing and other malcious activities at the same time monitoring and reducing the mail commmunciation as much as possible. Many companies have developed their communcation and correspondance platforms over their local office network which has been extremely beneficial in protection of classified information. On the other hand it has reduced the out sourcing of communication platforms, which is another great measure to avoid routine monitoring as the threat of cyber attacks is signifcantly reduced. Although, the issue of system and time capacity stills requires the need for a less freuent monitoring. Hence, the role of monitoring is indespensible for efficient use of resources and protection.
Although routine monitoring is benificial for the corporates. The corporates should not intrude the privacy of an employees while monitoring as the main goal of routine montioring is protecting the company and companies are made by its employees therefore a routine monitoring strategy will yield more desirable results only if the employees are comfortable and co-operate, hence the monitoring regimen should be designed with extreme car in order for the company to function as a healthy ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...apting the risks which may be caused by employees negligence. Routine monitoring not only...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting solution. Hence, the use of routine monitoring for all employee email corres...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e employees of a company as well as the general public needs to be extemely catuious while int...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an employee' or simply 'employees'?
Suggestion: an employee; employees
...extemely catuious while interaction. If an employees mistakenly corresponds with a impersons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n employees mistakenly corresponds with a impersonsator instead of a client,the c...
^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...with a impersonsator instead of a client,the company suffers from multiple lawsuits ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an employee' or simply 'employees'?
Suggestion: an employee; employees
...rates should not intrude the privacy of an employees while monitoring as the main goal of ro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51990049751 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11410696454 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559701492537 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.2986481429 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.6875 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401999898666 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129237414811 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581340265812 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253866602239 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354087153278 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.