Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.

Essay topics:

Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.

Now-a-days, e-mails are widely used to communicate with one another. One of the easiest ways of tracking someone's activities is to look at his e-mails. So, I agree with the claim that company management should monitor all employee e-mail correspondence.

Going through the e-mails sent and received by the employees will give the company management a good idea about the actions of their employees. It will create a sense of accountability in them which, in turn, will improve their competence. For example, if an employee of certain architecture firm is given the task to send a bill to a customer over e-mail for providing him the design of his building and the employee fails to do that, his mistake will be detected in the routine monitoring of his e-mails. Then proper actions can be taken as to why this mistake happened and how such a situation can be avoided in the future.

In addition that, in the case of an employee breaking company rules, checking his e-mails can help to identify his wrongdoings. For instance, if an employee of an automobile company takes bribe from a supplier to accept a faulty batch of raw materials and the company hierarchy doesn't know about this, it can create a big legal problem for them in future. However, if the employee is communicating with that person through e-mail, this crime will be found in their e-mails and the perpetrator can be punished before the whole company is wrongfully convicted for his individual crime.

Nevertheless, there can be a few negative effects of combing through all employee e-mail correspondence as well. Firstly, too much scrutiny can scare the employees and this can adversely impact their performance. Moreover, going through someone's personal e-mails can cause a breach of his privacy.

To summarize, monitoring e-mails of the employees can prove to be an efficient of ensuring high performance as long as the management is careful about nor breaching the privacy of the employees.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ion can be avoided in the future. In addition that, in the case of an employee breaki...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...raw materials and the company hierarchy doesnt know about this, it can create a big le...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...can create a big legal problem for them in future. However, if the employee is communica...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ails can cause a breach of his privacy. To summarize, monitoring e-mails of the ...
^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221288515406 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.156862745098 0.157235817809 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0700280112045 0.0880659088768 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0420168067227 0.0497285424764 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0504201680672 0.0444667217837 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140056022409 0.12292977631 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0560224089636 0.0406280797675 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87025825982 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0280112044818 0.030933414821 91% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.126050420168 0.0997080785238 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0448179271709 0.0249443105267 180% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00840336134454 0.0148568991511 57% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1972.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 327.0 452.878318584 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03058103976 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376146788991 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318042813456 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214067278287 0.200843997647 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11620795107 0.132149295362 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87025825982 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 219.290929204 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 54.5541218255 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 23.3571428571 23.380412469 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0770674089 59.4972553346 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 141.124799967 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 23.380412469 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.674092028746 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 55.1614242027 51.4728631049 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.67415730337 1.64882698954 102% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359519970544 0.391690518653 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.116786362169 0.123202303941 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0484418781808 0.077325440228 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.594682931847 0.547984918172 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150456050476 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146700175137 0.161403998019 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837934717336 0.0892212321368 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.343499843214 0.385218514788 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.128401243275 0.0692045440612 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234001047838 0.275328986314 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582175201977 0.0653680567796 89% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ion can be avoided in the future. In addition that, in the case of an employee breaki...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...raw materials and the company hierarchy doesnt know about this, it can create a big le...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...can create a big legal problem for them in future. However, if the employee is communica...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ails can cause a breach of his privacy. To summarize, monitoring e-mails of the ...
^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221288515406 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.156862745098 0.157235817809 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0700280112045 0.0880659088768 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0420168067227 0.0497285424764 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0504201680672 0.0444667217837 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140056022409 0.12292977631 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0560224089636 0.0406280797675 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87025825982 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0280112044818 0.030933414821 91% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.126050420168 0.0997080785238 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0448179271709 0.0249443105267 180% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00840336134454 0.0148568991511 57% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1972.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 327.0 452.878318584 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03058103976 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376146788991 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318042813456 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214067278287 0.200843997647 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11620795107 0.132149295362 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87025825982 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 219.290929204 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 54.5541218255 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 23.3571428571 23.380412469 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0770674089 59.4972553346 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 141.124799967 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 23.380412469 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.674092028746 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 55.1614242027 51.4728631049 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.67415730337 1.64882698954 102% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359519970544 0.391690518653 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.116786362169 0.123202303941 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0484418781808 0.077325440228 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.594682931847 0.547984918172 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150456050476 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146700175137 0.161403998019 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837934717336 0.0892212321368 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.343499843214 0.385218514788 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.128401243275 0.0692045440612 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234001047838 0.275328986314 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582175201977 0.0653680567796 89% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.