Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Work can be of various types. It might be the dull work at our jobs or even research carried out by academics in their field of interest. In each case, the quality and success of the work done can be determined when it is subjected to analysis and judgement. I agree with the author to some extent that the critical judgement of work should be carried out by someone in that field but we also need to take into account how the work affects the laymen as well as the people belonging to the esoteric field.
Let me take the example of a movie that is about to be released. We know that the primary objective of the director and story writer is to make the movie appealing to the broader audience. The audience, who I consider the laymen of this field, will appreciate the overall effect of the movie but not the minute details like lighting, sound or the photography. This is where the experts in these particular fields come in and who will be able to really dissect the movie and point out its weak and strong technical points. Here the movie I being judged both by the laymen as well as the experts of the field.
Now when an exceptional breakthrough is achieved by a physicist, the scientific papers that he might publish may not make any sense to a literature student, the layman in this case, and will not be able offer his opinions but a another physicists will understand this paper and offer his judgement.
Also, there is the case where a outsiders view might actually discover fallacies in the work which an experienced eye might miss due to their tunnel vision. A fresh eye with no preconceived notion will analyze the work in a manner different from the expert. This often happens when working on a computer code. You might not notice where you are going wrong but a second person hen gives it a look actually finds the error in a matter of second-something that was so simple but you were continuously overlooking.
So in my perspective, it really depends on the work and who it is targeted for will decide its critics .The experts will always be able to provide a clear analysis but if the said work targets the laymen as well, their input also needs to be taken into consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...strong technical points. Here the movie I being judged both by the laymen as well...
^
Line 2, column 571, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...movie I being judged both by the laymen as well as the experts of the field. Now when an ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...will not be able offer his opinions but a another physicists will understand this...
^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...dgement. Also, there is the case where a outsiders view might actually discover ...
^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... is targeted for will decide its critics .The experts will always be able to provi...
^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...s targeted for will decide its critics .The experts will always be able to provide ...
^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nalysis but if the said work targets the laymen as well, their input also needs t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, may, really, second, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5075 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53666981493 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.4196070486 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.2 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219710453176 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751125740208 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578361651322 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108959777158 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503721036918 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.