The author in this statement argues that critical judgement of work in any field has little importance unless it comes from an expert in that field. Is it true? While some people argues that judgement of work in any field has little value unless it comes from an expert in the field, other people believe that critical judgement may have importance rather than it comes from an expert in that field. An expert is a person who possess skills and knowledge better regarding a certain field than any other in that region or zone. Moreover, I believe that experience make man perfect. Critical judgement is utterly based on the decision making process. As far as I am concerned, I can concur with the author.
Firstly, an expert possess variety of knowledge and skills in a particular field. Surely, critical judgement acquires value and importance when it comes from an expert in that field, and further progress of that field becomes simple and facile. For example, in medical field, when a certain rare disease comes to view with a doctor who have not perform such operation before, he will seek help from an expert to deal with that disease to make better judgement to circumvent. Moreover, when an expert will give a hand of support, definitely a dilemma will be solved. Hence, we can say that an expert is necessary to make judgement precious.
Moreover, in criminal cases to solve mysterious cases police officers seek help from an expert in that field to get accurate and quick decision. An expert comes from an experience and ultimately, critical judgement holds value when it comes from an expert. For example, in many cases police officers or cops apply efforts to solve a mysterious criminal case, but they fail to solve case. But when it comes in contact with an expert such as CID, it will get solved in very short time than expected,only due to critical judgement hold an importance as it comes from an expert in that field.
However, in certain cases, there is not a requirement of an expert to deal situations, and get solved even without an expert in that field. Such cases do not call for an experience and just demand for superficial skills.
In conclusion, as I believe that an expert possess variety of skills in a field and has better experience than any other person, judgement quickly hold importance and great value when it comes from an expert in that field. As we can review from above examples, doctor seeks advice from an expert doctor to deal with rare disease or to perform operation, in short to circumvent from a difficult situation. Moreover, in many criminal cases, cops and police officers attempt to find an expert in that field to solve a dilemma, consequently, critical judgement hold great importance when it comes in contact with an expert person in that field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'performed'.
Suggestion: performed
...omes to view with a doctor who have not perform such operation before, he will seek hel...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , only
... solved in very short time than expected,only due to critical judgement hold an impor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in short, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80991735537 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52012594237 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.355371900826 0.4932671777 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3906107388 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0476190476 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2380952381 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490394154799 0.243740707755 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188447770932 0.0831039109588 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162468870581 0.0758088955206 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334416895609 0.150359130593 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116384243469 0.0667264976115 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.