Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Nowadays some people hold an opinion that critical judgment of work in a given field is useful, for they think that they can gain knowledges of that field which could make them work better. However, the realistic of the critical judgment is unknown for people who don't know this field well, which leads to a weakness that they may consider some bad judgment making them stressed out as a rule to follow. So, as for me, I would listen to people who is an expert in that field. Here I will give some reason to explain my point.
First, the expert may be the only group of people who has the words which could be realized as the only truth. Because the words they say do have strong connection with their academy career and they can't stand what they say about their majors are wrong. A Chinese named Tianlin Zhai has been found out to be a fake PH.D days ago, which is all because he once said he didn't know Zhiwang which is a website that collect almost all the academy resource in China on a TV show. This is an example about how wrong words said by a expert could effect his or her academy career. As a result, almost all the experts are careful with what they say in any occasion.
Second, what the expert say are always been tested by many other experts and has become a common point in that field. On the contrary, normal people are always hold positions which are correct in some occasion. As an expert, he may face the most critical question when he makes a presentation to other experts on a institute, which leads to a good situation that they always have the most powerful opinion compare to what is said by a normal person.
All in all, the word said by an expert is much more useful for us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ical judgment is unknown for people who dont know this field well, which leads to a ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...tion with their academy career and they cant stand what they say about their majors ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: D
...Zhai has been found out to be a fake PH.D days ago, which is all because he once ...
^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...o, which is all because he once said he didnt know Zhiwang which is a website that co...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n example about how wrong words said by a expert could effect his or her academy ...
^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... how wrong words said by a expert could effect his or her academy career. As a result,...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...akes a presentation to other experts on a institute, which leads to a good situat...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, so, well, as for, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 320.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.34375 5.05705443957 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07965404274 2.79657885939 74% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49375 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 704.065955056 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.59117977528 82% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6248432191 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.923076923 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208590841448 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822356062397 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056100790652 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123239982709 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640914356293 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 12.1639044944 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 100.480337079 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.