Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
I disagree with the statement the critical judgement of work in any has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. In practical, there are remarkable cases showing that even layperson could leverage in environment, science and field.
Environment field involves comprehensive knowledge of climate, geology and chemistry. It seems that only experts in this particular field could have an influential impact. However, Greta Thoburger who is a north European strikes school for opposing any exploration, adversely to the eco-system, by nations in the world. She tries to draw everyone's attention in the world for noting the importance of protecting eco-system. And she even go to United State congress and give a talk claiming slow down the environment exploration for economic reasons. Thus, even she is just a senior high school student, she still has made remarkable impact on the environment field.
Even science and technology field requires strongly prerequisite knowledge, it is possible for a layperson to make a productive comment in these field. For instance, Movie Matrix portrays a world that all humans have slept and controlled by (AI) artificial intelligence and a hero coming out to defeat the AI to release people retained by it. Today, the virtual reality comes true and one of the most accessible application is VR games on PS(play station) which is a video game machine. Thus, these comments are from lay people though, they still give inspiration or idea to scientists or experts.
The naysayers may argue that most comments from layperson are almost useless. Still, experts could have blind point of view. Since some experts are so inveterate that they already preclude many possibilities. For instance, the ex-president of Taiwan government education department has made a lot of universities without considering gradually declined low birthday. It causes a lot of school that can't recruit students to sustain their financial and break down. They're forced to close and this is detriment to a country. Thus, experts judgement could not be spotless and it is beneficial to open discussion and tolerate different opinion.
In conclusion, there are environment and science field that layperson could make contribution and experts could have flaw. Even experts should hold an open mind to accept different opinion, even from layperson.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 436, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'goes'.
Suggestion: goes
... of protecting eco-system. And she even go to United State congress and give a tal...
^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...experts could have blind point of view. Since some experts are so inveterate that the...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 397, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...irthday. It causes a lot of school that cant recruit students to sustain their finan...
^^^^
Line 4, column 462, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: They're
...sustain their financial and break down. Theyre forced to close and this is detriment t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'fields'?
Suggestion: fields
...sion, there are environment and science field that layperson could make contribution ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'flawed'.
Suggestion: flawed
...ake contribution and experts could have flaw. Even experts should hold an open mind ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30687830688 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88962527196 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57671957672 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1850373708 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5238095238 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.19047619048 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207973154842 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606413985787 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991899440598 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137703163514 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116159212913 0.0667264976115 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.