The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Controversy over whether citizen’s well-being being the best measurement of a leader is waged meaningful argument on both sides. While there is no doubt that a country exists for the welfare of its people, the conflict is centered on whether the effectiveness of the leader can be evaluated by this single aspect. In my point of view, although an effective leader is likely to lead a prosperous nation with happy citizen, this is not a definite causal relationship.
When we speak of reaching the well-being of the public, the following aims come to mind: safety and security towards military invasion, individual autonomy and freedom, sound health care and welfare system, cultural richness and overall comfort. Generally, people expect their leaders to bring these aims into fruition effectively. In recent COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan is viewed to be one of the happiest countries. We have sufficient medical resources, clear regulations and reliable communication platform between government and people, thus results in low infectious rate. Indeed, effectiveness of the leader plays a central role in successful disease’s control.
Nevertheless, an effective leader does not always lead to people's happiness since that well-being is such an objective feeling. For example, higher suicide rates are noted in countries of Northern Europe. For that they possess incomes above average, high educational level and sound welfare system, it is hard to image their unhappiness. In fact, according to the studies, it is partly attributes to the lack of serotonin resulted from less sunshine. Therefore, it is unpersuasive to say that the leaders are not effective simply based on high suicide rate.
Moreover, a North Korean leader, Kim Jong-Li, is famous for his effectiveness. He not only implement strict rules to uniform the whole country but also demonstrate his ambitions by unremitting development of nuclear power. However, we see that many people are struggling for the basic needs of survival, and the development is stagnant due to the inhibition of creativity and different thoughts. Consider other leaders such as Hitler or Starlin, whom most people would recognize as effective and powerful as well. They only represent personal great personal success, but contribute little to the general welfare. Dictatorship, being a form of leadership, actually has led many countries to their economic downfall and debased the quality of life of the citizens.
In conclusion, evaluating the effectiveness of a leader mainly depends on the well-being of the citizens is one-sided. On one hand, many factors influence people's well-being. On the other hand, if an effective leader focus more on personal achievement rather general welfare of the public, people’s well-being will not be guaranteed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...ffective leader does not always lead to peoples happiness since that well-being is such...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2376.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47465437788 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99175603535 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4230952226 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392279695311 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100040265626 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890510984475 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218402632546 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987527216815 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.