Government funding for pure science endeavors, such as space exploration, should be reduced in order to
direct more funding towards humanitarian science projects.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In
developing and supporting your position, be sure to consider specific instances for which this statement
may or may not be true.
To begin with the statement that more funding should be done by the government for humanitarian scientific explorations than on purely space explorations, I agree with this statement of the author as it is the need of the hour to carry humanitarian science projects for the better growth of human beings, to find the vaccines for new diseases because then only humans will have the ability to do more explorations and they have will to reach out in the space when they are healthy and in sound mind. Also, the ambitious projects of countries such as Star Wars for loading missiles in space is wastage of many and as well as dangerous for human civilization. And that money can be used on humanitarian science projects for the betterment of human beings.
However, the flaw which seems on funding for humanitarian science projects is: - like funding in countries such as Africa don’t bring any change because all the money invested is used by corrupt means in such countries. And that money reduced on space explorations for investing in such countries provides a setback to both explorations because all the money which could be used for useful explorations is wasted.
Further, the two explorations have the effect on one another and cutting the funds of one of them can affect the progress of another. For example, Space explorations to reduce global warming to fill up the hole in ozone layer are some of the very important task undertaken by space exploration scientists. Because these issues also create problems in human life and for this reason two explorations can go together. Also a space exploration done to stop U.V. rays is also an important place where two fields can work together.
Additionally, space explorations used for setting and maintaining of satellites has immense impact as the satellites have brought far-reaching connectivity between people. For example, the doctors from the hospital in remote area can consult from doctors far away on certain medical issues. A teacher can be provided to the students living in harsh geographical areas where it is hard to get for such a teacher by the help of online ventures. Further, the most important sector of country’s economy- the agriculture can also be benefited by weather forecasts system developed by space exploration scientists used in forecasting the untimely rains, flood and droughts saving a lot of food grain and also hundreds of lives from such calamities. The calamities like Tsunami or earthquake can also be foreseen and people can be saved by shifting to safer places.
So, space exploration is also a need of today’s society. Further, what human beings are doing today to the earth, they surely need to explore in outer space for another earth or planet on which we can survive as they are killing their own planet and no changes they are inculcating in their dangerous lifestyle which seems to lead to our extinction in near future from this planet and then we need a new home to live.
As a conclusion we can say that the two explorations have the importance at their own places. And one cannot take over the need of another both need to work together for whole human betterment and to make them realize the importance of planet earth and to save it from our greed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... to fill up the hole in ozone layer are some of the very important task undertaken by space...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...eason two explorations can go together. Also a space exploration done to stop U.V. r...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce where two fields can work together. Additionally, space explorations used fo...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and then we need a new home to live. As a conclusion we can say that the two ex...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, well, for example, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2734.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 554.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93501805054 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78213368396 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467509025271 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 858.6 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.031572866 60.3974514979 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.888888889 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7777777778 23.4991977007 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198320104205 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679553993441 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618424033722 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10931681841 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795177320997 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.8971910112 240% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.