Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Government is by the people and for the people and should always do what is best for the best interest of the poeple. When any decision is being made at the upper echelon of the governing body, usually the lower tier officials are supposed to carry out the operations more or less without any questions. Here the problem arises if any and every decision is being carried out without the rationalization of the individual, it may turn out to be autocratic. Well, though the government is chosen by the common people, the decision making process is given to the legislature and beurocrats who are apt in analysing and decision making process. Yet, there are situations where first hand experience of the plan-executioners come into being more practical. Experience can not always be replaced with radical ideas. The experience of the lower echelon officials thus should be sought for or at the least there should be encouragement to the officials to ask questions on the orders by their own judgement. Although, it comes with the drawback of stalling the execution process if such questions are raised repeatedly without carrying out any of the operations. Hence a proper redressal process of questions and balancing the execution should be taken in accordance.
During world war two, there was a situation when a russian neuclear powered submarine came under threat of attack to its mainland by the opponent and was ordered to trigger a nuke missile towards its enemy land. It was the envision of the commander of the operation of the ship that made him unsettled to be trigger happy and a puppet of orders. His judgement to wait for confirmation of attack, gave the time to ascertain the real situation to be a false alarm. This event is certainly comes to be the one that let the humanity not see a neuclear war. Had it not been the judgement of the commander of the operations, we sould see a different world today. Just by asking the question of his superiors and relying on his own experience, let him take the decision for the betterment of the humanity, let alone just the people of his country. This event is a burning illustration why any government official should rely on their own judgement than being just the executioner or orders. Addressing every question may not be feasible for in every aspect but definitely it makes the decision rituous in its purpose.
Now, the questioning of all the proposals could lead to stalling the whole process as well. Say, the order to carry out vaccination to eradicate polio, might lead to questioning of ethics on imposing such order to all the children. A single mistake or any problem in the vaccines, which may not be realized in the very moment, could cause havoc in the whole population. At the same time delaying the execution would lead to more kids growing up with the incurable desease. If the government takes proper measures to ensure the vaccination is proper in it's effect, carrying out the operations is of utmost importance, as it would help in uprooting the virus and cure the humanity from this disease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 915, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...ght for or at the least there should be encouragement to the officials to ask questions on th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...out carrying out any of the operations. Hence a proper redressal process of questions...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecution should be taken in accordance. During world war two, there was a situat...
^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... missile towards its enemy land. It was the envision of the commander of the operation of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 667, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'asking' instead.
Suggestion: asking
...ld see a different world today. Just by asking the question of his superiors and relying on his own...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, so, thus, well, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2545.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82007575758 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75943199991 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467803030303 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 812.7 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.017041997 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.681818182 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178344511494 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510364975143 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683400386773 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114576683142 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482704825208 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.