Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position
The development of any society resides on its scientific research. The outcomes revolutionize all the different sector whether it is economy, education, manufacturing and also other fields of science. Scientists conduct research first in a theoretical manner and then they use experiments to test their results. The alarming problem is that these tests are expensive thus the government is reluctant to fund experiments that have unclear results. In my opinion, the government should offer financial help to these researches even if the outcomes are not clear for three main reasons.
Initially, the experiments are mainly governed by the laws of nature. In other words, even if studies have shown that under certain circumstances an experiment should yield the theoretically found results different things might happen. For example, if we study that certain elements chemical reaction will yield a new compound based on their components the experiment can yield a different one or it might not even happen. Some experiment needs e catalyst to trigger them and this would have never been found if it was not for testing. This shows that studies give a trajectory but various compounds might come in contact and change the result. Moreover, it is crucial as it shows that the studies made have flaws that might cause in the future great losses.
Secondly, most research that are risky and serious needs to be tested. The theoretical study provides wrong data. Taking the airplane's wings as a way of illustration, science is still not able to give empirical equations for the turbulent flow over the wings. Furthermore, simulation gives very different and unconceivable numbers even if the inputs are the same so the only way to check the design and aerodynamics is by using wind tunnels. These tests never fail to provide accurate values. Let4s assume that the government does not provide any more for these types of tests then no improvement will be done on the structure of airplanes yet improvements are necessary because the demand is really high and the means are scarce to keep using the same designs.
Finally, many of the theories and equations used in our daily education were found by chance or by experiment. Test never fail to give accurate evidence and if the results are not similar to the outcome then they are, in fact, interesting and crucial to the thesis because they will help correct if not innovate the theory. Many researchers actually insert the wanted outcome as an input and use experiments to compare the outcomes to the input. If the outcome is similar then the difference is zero which is perfect if not then the system will correct the disturbances and then repeat the experiment for no errors. Some applications require no errors as it will cost lives such as airplanes and rockets and medicine as well.
In conclusion, experiments are imperative for a nation that seeks success. They lead to Improve the life of humanity and come up with solutions for the scarce materials. In addition, experiments are the best tools to understand how our nature works and how to control it better.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posi 50
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER
Message: Consider replacing "in a theoretical manner" with adverb for "theoretical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ence. Scientists conduct research first in a theoretical manner and then they use experiments to test t...
Line 8, column 271, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
... our nature works and how to control it better.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2608.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 518.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03474903475 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73614173228 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511583011583 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 821.7 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5146581082 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.32 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.72 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0842759036407 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0260817443161 0.0831039109588 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338684379289 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0502667097506 0.150359130593 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393883596858 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.