Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.

Innovation and the technological advancements are reason for the shape of the world as we know it today. For any scientist or an engineer they can only come up with new innovations if they are given the liberty and resources to explore. And in any new innovation the research has a vital role to play because during this phase is when one would know and understand the limitations, boundaries, applications and implications of their idea. Research usually takes up lot of resources either in the way of time or money or even the knowledgeable people available to accomplish the task. It would be more practical if a governments or wealthy organizations can fund these research and aid to the prosperity of our technological advancement.

First of all, as mentioned earlier governments or wealthy organizations would be the ideal supporters for any research considering the logistics involved in it. Having said this it brings the question of what kind of projects or researches should be funded. When it’s a private organization they can proceed as they please as it’s their money. However in the case of government funded researches they have to be very cautions while supporting these researches financially as the funds of the government are mostly the tax payers hard earned dime.

Second of all, if this policy is implemented there could be two benefits right away which are primarily we can keep a tab on the dead ended or life endangering researches. This would directly save the resources and additionally the urge to come up with ideas and possibilities that would help in the betterment of common man would increase in the scientific community who intend to receive the government aid.

Third of all, It is not implied in any way that the researches should be avoided. It is only said that before funding a research with the money of the common folk it would be best if more scrutiny is done on the validity of the idea and the consequences it has, not just economically but also how it impacts a regular household.

In conclusion the research and innovation must be encouraged but we need to be more responsible with the resources we use as any resources misused for a wrong project would ultimately mean lesser resources available for the much need one.

Votes

Essay Categories

GMAT/GRE Issue Task

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...ty and resources to explore. And in any new innovation the research has a vital role to play b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 615, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a government' or simply 'governments'?
Suggestion: a government; governments
...the task. It would be more practical if a governments or wealthy organizations can fund these...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 663, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this research' or 'these researches'?
Suggestion: this research; these researches
...ments or wealthy organizations can fund these research and aid to the prosperity of our techno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eed as they please as it’s their money. However in the case of government funded resear...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ed. It is only said that before funding a research with the money of the common folk it wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the best'.
Suggestion: be the best
...h the money of the common folk it would be best if more scrutiny is done on the validit...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in conclusion, kind of, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91191709845 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96854115183 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1878055149 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236121940416 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866738857827 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703288429394 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133556919185 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755323195703 0.0667264976115 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in conclusion, kind of, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments