Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Education is one of the basic rights of the citizens of a nation. With the increasing modernization, the number of schools, colleges and universities is increasing rapidly. Instead of having enough options to study in, not everyone can afford the expense of education which becomes even more higher if one desires to study in a comparatively better institute. As a result education comes to an end after college to the insolvent students. But I disagree with the statement that governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted but unable to afford the tuition for two particular reasons.
First of all, if a country has a lower GDP, it may happen that a lot of people lives below the poverty line who are not even able to afford money for their food or clothes. So it is obvious that they will not be able to afford their higher education in spite of having high penchant for it. On the other hand, a government of a country with lower GDP has a lot of sectors to focus on for the ultimate development of the country. Providing allowance for tuition to every student willing and unable to pay for their education may result as a hindrance to the development in other essential sectors. In the African countries people live below the poverty line. It is not possible for the government to offer fund to every student for university education. So the idea of offering free university study fell short here.
Additionally, if government offers allowance to every student willing to continue university education, people may take advantage of this by doing forgery leading to ultimate destruction in the development of the country. People hardly having money to eat food or live in may take the advantage of the situation by making false document to extract more money from government as allowance which will have a negative effect in the moral character of the next generation.
Some may argue that not offering free tuition to the insolvent students may result in economical destruction in the long term case. But yet, development in other sectors is even more important to save the country from even worse situation. However, government may take steps to arrange some examinations to find out the students who have high potentials but in capable of paying the tuition fees and offer free education to them. From the discussion above, it is clear that providing stipend to every insolvent student can never be a solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...expense of education which becomes even more higher if one desires to study in a comparativ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...higher education in spite of having high penchant for it. On the other hand, a go...
^^
Line 13, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... of the next generation. Some may argue that not offering free tuition to the i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, as a result, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90930787589 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75339474266 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45107398568 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.9 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6393619705 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.277777778 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2777777778 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274876256613 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921244433122 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092304238439 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170201481066 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554937583516 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.