If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
The evolution of human race very much depends on the actions every individual or a group takes throughout their lives. Every person has their own goals and these goals need not match with others’ interests. And this particular individual or the group will strive hard to achive these set of goals by various mean possible. Some might stop in the way maybe because of various reasons and somemight go to ends to meet their deeds. The argument in the claim states that all actions taken to attain these goals are justifiable. Although, I agree this to an extent, I disagree with the claim for the following reasons explained below.
Goals has a different interpretation for every individual. However, if the struggle attains a “postive effect” for the society as a whole without having any negative consequences, one might fight for the cause to the very end. For example, consider the freedom struggle of India. India had been under the Birtish rule for almost 150 years. People were looted and were stripped of their fundamental rights. The whole nation suffered and needed independece to be free. So, when people like Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, etc, fought for the independence, the whole nation joined them and India was set free on 15th January 1947. If you look at this example, the cause here is a commom ground of oppresion for the whole nation. So, a cause like this can be faught till one achives the final goal.
However, not all goals of a person or a group can have a postive effect on everyones’ life. There are people who scam others for money. And they stuggle in every way to entice them into some trap and lure them into losing their hard-earned money in one way or other. Consider the popluar example of Satyam Scam happended in India. The CEO of Satyam industries fabricated the and results of the company and created the impression that the company was blooming with results and raised the hopes of not the people working in the company, but also for every stakeholder. As a result, the company price skyrocketted duriong the peirod of the scam. However, once the truth came out that the CEO is just manipulating the results of the company to increase the value of the company, the stock price plummetted and the company fell apart. Although the goal of the CEO is to increase the value of the company, he faught it in the wrong way where there are many negative implications. So, these type of actions cannot to be justified.
Not all people want the society to be good. Consider Osama Bin Laden, the infamous terrorist responsible for the 9/11 attacks that till date, is one of the most gruellsome event in the history of the United Stated of America. Bin Laden, along with his deciples, highjackjed airplanes and bulldozed them into the then twin towers. Many poeple died in this massacre and many lost their loved ones. The reason no matter how big, cannot justify Bin Laden’s act.
In conculsion, the term “goal” although superficially attributed in a positive sense, has to been looked up carefully before concluding that all the actions taken to achieve this goal can be justfied. If a kid is working part-time to clear his education loans, or a if it is a group of people trying to establish a library in their society, all the struggles they take to achieve this goal can be justified, provided, there is no third party harm. And if it is a terrorist group aiming to harm people, no matter how good the reasons might be, cannot be justified.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 265, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t-time to clear his education loans, or a if it is a group of people trying to es...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, then, third, as to, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2899.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 608.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76809210526 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9656475924 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53215075796 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488486842105 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 900.0 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.4101098486 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.59375 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59375 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132527085243 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031416470216 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488369637015 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687000700057 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383628876431 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.