If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
: It is true that one has to give whatever they have to achieve their goal. It is very important to filter actions with positive effect from the actions with negative effects. I agree that a lot of effort goes into achieving a goal but their has to be a line that determines whether the means the person is using are ethically and morally correct. Therefore, it can't be said that any method adapted to reach the final destination is justified just because the person thinks that his/her goal is worth it.
Different people have different goals, some have the goal to make their business successful while some might have the goal to take revenge from the person who abused them. For every individual their goal is "worthy", that consists for poeple wanting to start their own business and also vindictive people seeking revenge on someone in order to get justice for themselves. According to the statement, reaching one's goal by hook or by crook is justified, but what if a person sabotages another person in order to achieve their goal, is that still justified? No, it is not justified because the journey that leads to the goal is very important and must not be dominated by actions that physically or mentally harm someone else. And so a person should always be aware of the path they are choosing to achieve their goal.
For instance, lets take a person who aspires to open a restaurant but cannot afford the investment required to open the restaurant, he thinks that his goal of opening a restaurant is very essential to meet his family's needs, now, in order to open the restaurant the man robs a bank, this is not correct, his needs donot justify his robbery. Hence, the path chosen to reach the goal is very important, one cannot use subterfuge and think that because he/she thought that his/her goal is worth it, they can use ill-methods to reach it.
In conclusion, any action that enables a person to reach a goal they think is "worthy" doesnot mean it is justified. The actions a person takes to reach his goal must not be inimical for others in any way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ally and morally correct. Therefore, it cant be said that any method adapted to reac...
^^^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ally and morally correct. Therefore, it cant be said that any method adapted to reac...
^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
.... According to the statement, reaching ones goal by hook or by crook is justified, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72404371585 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62494995036 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489071038251 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.204448289 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1538461538 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104595137461 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478142730339 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0222203169109 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769685531645 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243424545752 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.