If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is often debated about how long and how far one should be willing to go to achieve his/her dreams. Statement here says, if a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. It is widely debated, as for one person the same thing could justifiable, but for someone else it will not. The question is what will constitute right and wrong. To achieve something farfetched and desirous, people are willing to go beyond the limits; but this is justifiable only until there is no case of foul play and you are not encroaching upon someone else's right illegally.
Worthiness of any goal can be questioned as it can not hold the same status for all the concerned parties. In case of any insurgency or internal revolt in any country or nation, concerned parties will have their own criteria to justify, whatever they are doing is justifiable. Nevertheless, these claims may be worthy from one's perspective but quelling such revolts by means of inhuman practices are never justified. In Syria, each party is claims their cause is worthy, but use of force to overcome other and harrowing killing of millions of innocuous citizens are certainly unjust. Use of Bio-chemical weapons to suppress a movement holds no credence in today's world.
Hitler's goal to achieve pure race of people in his territory was glorified beyond scope, it was worthy from his and followers of Nazi Germans. If we look from humanitarian aspects neither the goal nor the means used to achieve can ever be given credit. In sporting events, every athlete’s goal is for glory and every one of them aims to stand at the podium. But to use banned drugs to gain power and edge over other is strongly condemned. Unless every athlete is at the same level, competition is not worthy. It is widely accepted that use of such drugs should be condemned. This surely gives an insight about difference between right and wrong, and how far one should go to achieve success.
On the contrary, if things are kept fair and legal, going to any means to achieve their dream is surely a positive thing. In a free and fair play, an athlete can go beyond his/her limits to practice and prepare themselves for the events. Competition at level playing field and doing things at an extraordinary level are always welcomed in society. Working 16 hrs a day to reach pinnacle of one's career can never be maligned. Whereas, earning a name while foul play will surely be discouraged across world. The case of Tiger woods and Lance Armstrong is a sure indicator of such foul play.
Conclusively, going to any means to achieve your dream is justifiable unless these are done within the legality and morality of general mass.
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little. 58
- Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Reason: The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 58
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 70
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
...rthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. It is widely debated, as f...
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: ONES
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
...heless, these claims may be worthy from ones perspective but quelling such revolts b...
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: ONES
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
...rking 16 hrs a day to reach pinnacle of ones career can never be maligned. Whereas, ...
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e of ones career can never be maligned. Whereas, earning a name while foul play will su...
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'whereas', 'while', 'as for', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217898832685 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.18093385214 0.157235817809 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0953307392996 0.0880659088768 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0525291828794 0.0497285424764 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0350194552529 0.0444667217837 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114785992218 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0544747081712 0.0406280797675 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59334741752 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0389105058366 0.030933414821 126% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0758754863813 0.0997080785238 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0272373540856 0.0249443105267 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00778210116732 0.0148568991511 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2687.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 466.0 452.878318584 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7660944206 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.330472103004 0.366273622748 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.242489270386 0.280924506359 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.150214592275 0.200843997647 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0922746781116 0.132149295362 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59334741752 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 219.290929204 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523605150215 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 61.3670528258 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4166666667 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1730188892 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.958333333 141.124799967 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.458333333333 0.674092028746 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 43.6655937053 51.4728631049 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.44202898551 1.64882698954 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389780909575 0.391690518653 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0872664034061 0.123202303941 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0403754267195 0.077325440228 52% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.462881449076 0.547984918172 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.145883421814 0.149214159877 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134862872198 0.161403998019 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754668256695 0.0892212321368 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.326213820107 0.385218514788 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0419852956605 0.0692045440612 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261481271855 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472974047388 0.0653680567796 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.