It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Humans can never live by themselves. The interaction between us is the very essence that distinguishes us from the natural animals and thus can explain to some extent, about our traits. Nonetheless, not all our behaviors are comprehensible by the gatherings we are attached with, and this is explicit to the salient beings of each group.
Admittedly, assessment of humans without the consideration for the social groups they are included is difficult. Humans are social animals and thus cannot be detached from social groups. Also, in many cases, the groups that we participate in presents some of our essential characteristics. For example, when people engage with each other, they often ask questions about schools, work, or even families. By acquiring these background information, one can evaluate others: if one participates in a Sunday football league, it will clearly present that he likes outdoor activities and sports, enabling to conclude him as outgoing. Hence, a group of people that humans engage may show the outline of the individual.
Nevertheless, humans possess free will and act as individuals while still conforming to the social standards. Within the boundaries set by the government, corporation or any community, one's action is decided by themselves. Employers can set goals for each employee but it can not decide how to reach them since it is up to the worker and their style of working: one can do it for a prolonged time, or others will be wanting to finish it in a hurry. Consequently, the group of people that a person associates with will not be enough to portray the qualities of that person.
Moreover, people who acquiesce to the society will not be able to outstand over others. Since a community consist of similar people, to be salient, one should be able to act differently. For instance, a modest and hard-working student will hardly be remembered after graduation in a public school because those types of students are so platitudinous. In contrast, a student with a good sense of humor that presents facetious actions to enlighten the class will be a memory that is reminisced throughout the teacher's career. Therefore, the society that we participate in cannot determine the traits of every individual, not to mention the people who are conspicuous in their groups.
In conclusion, although a coarse image of a person can be delineated by the communities that incorporate the person, it is not enough to show the full characteristics. In addition, outstanding people's behaviors are exclusive to be defined by the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...vernment, corporation or any community, ones action is decided by themselves. Employ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 414, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...it for a prolonged time, or others will be wanting to finish it in a hurry. Consequently, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15714285714 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04778552373 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538095238095 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.197960761 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 5.21951772744 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103468025149 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348832615997 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326057584632 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061841289768 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368485983967 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.