The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f

We live in the age of developing technology.It is undoubtedly true that technical advances have made human life far more comfortable and convenient today. However, this convenience to some extent has taken away human ability to think and create new ideas. I, therefore, partially agree with the given stance - The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life have led to certain pitfalls in creating strong and independent individuals.
To begin with, one can rightfully claim that the recent technological advances have increased human productivity. A striking example is of the mundane use of the GPS in cars. Rather than memorizing the complex routes in today's era of confounding road structures, it is definitely way much easier to turn on the navigation (GPS) app. Such is the beauty of the Age of Technology.Indeed, the smartphone comprises endless details for trite necessities.
Nonetheless, any thing which is provided in excess is harmful. Likewise, the fast pacing technological era posits its own drawbacks. One of the greatest challenge faced by the human race is that of Global warming. Although, man has successfully invented green houses, the solution for preventing ozone depletion goes unanswered. At the end, a comfort of endless toiling in the sun is replaced with the risk of skin cancer. On the other hand, owing to excessive urbanization issues like unemployment have come in the frame.
On one hand, there is the fabulous invention of calculators, on the contrary a risk of inability to do mental math belies. Not only, today, is there a scope to watch TV shows on you tube, but also there stands an alarming risk of physical inactivity.
In a nutshell, i would like to conclude that luxuries and conveniences in today's era do motivate people, but simultaneously if enjoyed in abundance they equally play a role in challenging the dependency of humans.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
We live in the age of developing technol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ive in the age of developing technology.It is undoubtedly true that technical adva...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g strong and independent individuals. To begin with, one can rightfully claim ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 393, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Indeed
... is the beauty of the Age of Technology.Indeed, the smartphone comprises endless detai...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...endless details for trite necessities. Nonetheless, any thing which is provided...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...sities. Nonetheless, any thing which is provided in excess is harmful....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e unemployment have come in the frame. On one hand, there is the fabulous inven...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... alarming risk of physical inactivity. In a nutshell, i would like to conclude ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...y. In a nutshell, i would like to conclude that luxuries an...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, nonetheless, so, therefore, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16393442623 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13869282135 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645901639344 0.4932671777 131% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3830713426 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4375 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144672196875 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371439339587 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056948560601 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650553301499 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062931931922 0.0667264976115 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.