Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement says that women and men are different physically and hence are not equally capable of doing many tasks. The statement is correct but partially. Yes, there is certain difference is physicality of a man and a woman. But the second part that both are not equally capable of doing a particular task is wrong. It could have been valid in pre technology era but not in current scenario, when most of the human jobs are automated and required machines to complete any task.
In the existing era of technology, advanced machines and AI have been taken up most of the task completion job. This brings an ease in day-to-day task of our lives which was previously done by humans only. For instance, many household chores can be performed by using machines, whether it is vacuum cleaner for cleaning, washing machines for laundry, dishwasher, and smart speakers or advanced digital technology for achieving many other tasks. Now, with the help of technology it's not just woman but also man who could perform chores easily with the help of these gadgets. Similarly, in the manufacturing industries due to the advancement in many automated machines, now women could perform a certain job with the help of machines which was previously only possible or suitable for men to do.
Also, the type and nature of task is the deciding factor whether the task is doable for a man/woman or not. It is a prevalent notion that a woman or female is highly suitable for rearing a child and hence, they woman should be majorly responsible for raising a child. Women are generally associated with terms like warmhearted, motherly love and giving and hence, are expected to take up the job of child rearing solely sometimes. However, we have seen many examples in our society where a father has done tremendous job in raising his kid(s) single-handedly. It just notions and prejudices that society has a certain task is suitable for one gender than the other. Whereas the reality is both the gender possess equal quality to perform any task properly.
Today in our lives we could many examples of role reversals. We could see, many men who are willing opting for leaving jobs and being stay-at-home husbands while their wives job out and earn money. As the society advancing many notions has been breaking and we could see many positive changes around us. The given statement is starting to lose its validity in current world and it would lose more in upcoming years, as society is advancing.
Therefore, assuming that men and women are different in physical capabilities and therefore cannot do all the tasks equally is an obsolete mind-set ad it does not hold any validity in current world of advanced technology whether almost everything, any job can be performed by both men and women equally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 665, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...suitable for one gender than the other. Whereas the reality is both the gender possess ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89894736842 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62825052669 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490526315789 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2315260864 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.80952381 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.619047619 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168184566014 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505904864867 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477024571612 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984920331483 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233410721349 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.